-Original Message-
>From: Pepe Barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jul 18, 2008 12:24 PM
>To: Fink Devel
>Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: [Swig-user] how modular is the support for
>the various languages?
>
>
>On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:05 PM, David Reiser wr
-Original Message-
>From: Pepe Barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jul 18, 2008 12:24 PM
>To: Fink Devel
>Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: [Swig-user] how modular is the support for
>the various languages?
>
>
>On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:05 PM, David Reiser wr
On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:05 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> OK. From the horse's mouth, so to speak. Swig should be able to be
> built and installed without any languages, and even if it finds and
> tests languages, the core swig remains the same.
>
> There was one dissenting comment from an ocaml use
OK. From the horse's mouth, so to speak. Swig should be able to be
built and installed without any languages, and even if it finds and
tests languages, the core swig remains the same.
There was one dissenting comment from an ocaml user, but I it wasn't
an "it doesn't work" complaint.
I
