On Jun 29, 2014, at 11:42 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> We've been discussing on IRC whether we want a new tree for 10.10's
> packages and no upgrade from 10.9, or to allow an in-place upgrade from
> 10.9 and keep their packaging in a common tree.
>
> One idea that came up was to have a 10.9
We've been discussing on IRC whether we want a new tree for 10.10's
packages and no upgrade from 10.9, or to allow an in-place upgrade from
10.9 and keep their packaging in a common tree.
One idea that came up was to have a 10.9 tree and to move 10.9-specific
package descriptions to that. The
