Thanks -
I've now had a couple of responses, and the conclusion is that I can
leave it as OSI-Approved.
Peace
- John
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> well… as far as I understand, INRIA license is basically a "new BSD-
> license"
> which is OSI-approved too
>
> On 8/1/
well… as far as I understand, INRIA license is basically a "new BSD-license"
which is OSI-approved too
On 8/1/07, John Ridgway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friends -
> I'm working on an update to the aspectj port, and I need advice on
> what to fill in for the License field. The current value is
Friends -
I'm working on an update to the aspectj port, and I need advice on
what to fill in for the License field. The current value is OSI-
Approved, which is probably incorrect. AspectJ (TM) is distributed
under the EPL, which is OSI-Approved, but it includes Third Party
Content license
