Re: [Fink-devel] Maintainers (was: FYI: SDL change)

2006-03-20 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: However, I must disagree about how wonderful collaborative packaging could be. Once upon a time, somebody had the great idea that rather than individual maintainers for each of the Gnome packages, Fink should have a Gnome Team which worked

Re: [Fink-devel] Maintainers (was: FYI: SDL change)

2006-03-19 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote: And though I understand that you feel snubbed at having your package "taken out of your hands," I feel that packages *should* be able to be taken out of a maintainer's hands, as long as responsibility for the changes are also taken out of th

[Fink-devel] Maintainers

2004-12-03 Thread Allan Henriksen
Hello, I've got nothing better to do, so I can maintain a few packages. I've selected those which I use myself ofcourse. esond libogg and xmms I added a fink-package called xmms-osx, so I'm on that one too Great work guys --- SF email is sponsore

[Fink-devel] maintainers still active?

2003-06-20 Thread Thomas Kotzian
i have some updated packages in the queue and couldn't reach the maintainers directly. please call up when you're still active: abiword-1.0.5-1 (Jeffrey Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) bind9-9.2.2-1 (Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) bind9-ssl-9.2.2-1 (Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) fetc