At 15:27 Uhr -0500 17.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>My point of view about the dependent packages is this: if a user tells us
>that he/she is successfully using the latest version of package foo, then
>we know that he/she is also successfully using at least some version of
>everything that f
My point of view about the dependent packages is this: if a user tells us
that he/she is successfully using the latest version of package foo, then
we know that he/she is also successfully using at least some version of
everything that foo depends on (even if the user doesn't point that out
expli
Excellent idea, I'd include aalib and libmpeg as the gimp needs these
and samba as well.
Matt
On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 05:19 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user, and
> fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should forge
looks good to me, thought qt and bind9 should be added to the list IMHO.
But I think it's a good email to send like once week :P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user,
>and fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should
>fo
I plan to send out the following mail to fink-beginners, fink-user,
and fink-announce. Please tell me what you think of it, if should
forget the idea, or change something about it; you may also want to
suggest changes to the list of "important" package I gave (I tried to
keep it short, but obv
