Re: [Fink-devel] Positive feedback on unstable packages

2002-12-17 Thread Jeremy Higgs
I just double checked this, and it indeed does not produce any binaries! Oops! I'm recompiling now, and trying to find out what the problem is... Thanks! On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 09:02 AM, Xavier HUMBERT wrote: BTW, one failed (or lacks information) - oroborus2 2.0.9-1-1

Re: [Fink-devel] Positive feedback on unstable packages

2002-12-17 Thread Steven Burr
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 03:02 PM, Xavier HUMBERT wrote: I just checked what I use regulary, from unstable, (even without knowing it :-) - blackbox 0.65-0.1 - debianutils 1.23-1 - gnome-libs-* 1.4.2-2 - libdnet 1.5-2 - nessus (whole)1.2.6-1 - ncftp

Re: [Fink-devel] Positive feedback on unstable packages

2002-12-17 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Remi Mommsen) wrote : > Usually a package > compiles flawlessly and is forgotten to be still unstable despite it is > frequently in use. Others are doing the job perfectly well but are not > used explicitly (like some libraries, utilities within KDE/gnome etc.). I just checked

[Fink-devel] Positive feedback on unstable packages

2002-12-17 Thread Remi Mommsen
was: Re: [Fink-devel] Re: The second Version ... fink survey. Hi, On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 06:29 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: The help that we really, desperately need is for more users to be willing to enable the unstable tree, compile packages from source, and report to the maintainer