On 2010-01-03 17:11:55 +, Martin Costabel said:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
main/archives.c:tarobject() uses a static buffer to store a filename
during installation. Wanna guess the size of fnamebuf[]? Try bumping
it to something much larger. Latest dpkg upstream still has this
same hardcoded size.
This may even be legal, seeing that
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:39:45AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
main/archives.c:tarobject() uses a static buffer to store a filename
during installation. Wanna guess the size of fnamebuf[]? Try bumping
it to something much larger. Latest dpkg upstream still has this
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Updating the list of locally
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:11:55PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
This looks like dpkg is not able to handle files with a file name longer
than 256 characters. On the other hand, I don't understand why this bug
only shows up on 10.6/32bit and not on 10.6/64bit nor on 10.5/32bit.
Also doesn't seem to choke on 10.4/ppc. Wonder if
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:09:09PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
This looks like dpkg is not able to handle files with a file name longer
than 256 characters. On the other hand, I don't understand why this bug
only shows up on 10.6/32bit and not on 10.6/64bit nor