Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Do we still need 'fink checksums'?

Am 13.08.2004 um 20:41 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:51:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Macks wrote: The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. [...] Does anyone still use this mode? Do we still need this

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Do we still need 'fink checksums'?

On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:51:11PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Daniel Macks wrote: > > > >> The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first > >> started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. [...] > >> Does anyone still use this mode? Do we still need this > >> functionality

[Fink-devel] Re: Do we still need 'fink checksums'?

>Daniel Macks wrote: > >> The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first >> started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. The code implementing it is >> marked: >> >> # HACK HACK HACK >> # This is to be removed soon again, only a temporary tool to allow >> # checking of all avai