At 17:03 Uhr -0400 19.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
>Max, you've become rather emotional over absolutely nothing. I
>think it's clouding your judgement.
Uhm... yes? Thanks that you tell me, I wasn't aware I was emotional
about this :-) OK maybe a bit annoyed, since it seems we are
completly mis
Thanks. I've seen that you guys are extremely responsive, even Max,
when he's not being so defensive. You have nothing to apologize for.
Keep up the good work. I'll leave fink-devel alone now so that you can
get some work done. -Mark
David R. Morrison wrote:
>Mark,
>
>As you have correct
Mark,
As you have correctly pointed out, fink's evolution package is unusable.
Max has removed it so that others will not have to go through an experience
similar to yours.
Most of fink's packages are in fact usable. We're sorry that you had a
poor initial experience. If you have trouble with
Max, you've become rather emotional over absolutely nothing. I think
it's clouding your judgement.
Max Horn wrote:
> At 20:07 Uhr -0400 18.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
>
>> Hi Max, I think you misunderstood some of what I was saying.
>> I've added comments inline below. -Mark
>>
>> Max Horn wr
At 11:45 Uhr -0600 19.05.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>I've got an evolution-1.0.5 package working with SSL (aside from the
>calendar, which is still broken). If it's OK with Max, I'll commit it
>tommorrow.
Yeah that would suite me well. I just started work on that, too, but
if you have already d
I've got an evolution-1.0.5 package working with SSL (aside from the
calendar, which is still broken). If it's OK with Max, I'll commit it
tommorrow.
-Jeff
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> At 20:07 Uhr -0400 18.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
> >Hi Max, I think you misunderstood some of what
At 20:07 Uhr -0400 18.05.2002, Mark Rahner wrote:
>Hi Max, I think you misunderstood some of what I was saying.
>I've added comments inline below. -Mark
>
>Max Horn wrote:
>>I understand your disappointment with the problems in the evolution
>>package, [...]
>>I know that it has flaws, but it de
Mark:
Just to put this all in a bit of perspective: I understand that the Debian
project has around 700 developers. Fink has 20 core developers, plus
another 20-30 people who have made substantial contributions.
Apple offered some support to fink late last summer in the form of providing
pre-r
On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 01:07 AM, Mark Rahner wrote:
>> 2) The tool chain for maintaining a bindist must be updated to support
>> bindist. It must be improved to allow easy use, and be made "fool
>> proof" (because everybody, that includes me, makes mistakes and it's
>> not so nice if tha
Hi Max, I think you misunderstood some of what I was saying.
I've added comments inline below. -Mark
Max Horn wrote:
> I understand your
> disappointment with the problems in the evolution package, [...]
> I know that it has flaws, but it definitly is useable.
Evolution is *not* usable now bec
10 matches
Mail list logo
