Hi,
On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:57:23AM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due
to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist.
That's not an
On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due
to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist.
That's not an "unusable" state, since fink will merely issue a "please
install the apt pkg" warning. But anyway...
I think what was
On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due
to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist.
That's not an "unusable" state, since fink will merely issue a "please
install the apt pkg" warning. But anyway...
I think what was
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:57:23AM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> >>>If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due
> >>>to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist.
> >
> >That's not an "unusable" state, since fink will
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:33:36PM -0800, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
> >
> >We recommend more and more often to use the debfoster fink package to
> >keep track of unneeded packages on a Fink installation. One problem
> >that users are facing with
Hi,
On Jan 20, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
Dear Fink Developers
We recommend more and more often to use the debfoster fink package to
keep track of unneeded packages on a Fink installation. One problem
that users are facing with debfoster is that it asks to remove too
many packa
