Re: [Fink-devel] Removal of mozilla from dist

2010-07-29 Thread Philip Lamb
Hanspeter, Go right ahead. There's no sane reason anyone would still be using openvrml as opposed to openvrml016. Even openvrml016 is getting old. I'll need to look at porting the latest version sometime. Regards, Phil. On 28/07/2010, at 10:26 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: The package

Re: [Fink-devel] Removal of mozilla from dist

2010-07-29 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On Thu, July 29, 2010 6:06 am, Philip Lamb wrote: Hanspeter, Go right ahead. There's no sane reason anyone would still be using openvrml as opposed to openvrml016. Even openvrml016 is getting old. I'll need to look at porting the latest version sometime. Regards, Phil. I've gone ahead

[Fink-devel] Removal of mozilla from dist

2010-07-28 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
The package mozilla is _very_ old, and probably has gazillion of security issues. It also conflicts with some changes that JFM and myself wish to make to firefox seamonkey. Currently, the only package that depends on it is openvrml, which has been superseded by openvrml016. Philip, can

Re: [Fink-devel] Removal of mozilla from dist

2010-07-28 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com said: The package mozilla is _very_ old, and probably has gazillion of security issues. It also conflicts with some changes that JFM and myself wish to make to firefox seamonkey. Currently, the only package that depends on it is openvrml,