At 10:48 Uhr -0500 21.03.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Oh wait, I can answer my own question by looking at the scripts in
>/sw/are/lib/dpkg/info. They are indeed /bin/sh and it looks like it
>was fink that make them thay way.
>
>So for consistency, I agree.
>
>By the way, there is an old commen
Oh wait, I can answer my own question by looking at the scripts in
/sw/are/lib/dpkg/info. They are indeed /bin/sh and it looks like it
was fink that make them thay way.
So for consistency, I agree.
By the way, there is an old comment of chrisp's in the docs which hints
that he was planning to s
What does dpkg use to execute prerm etc. scripts? Also /bin/sh?
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
no this is fine by me and I think it's a great idea.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In fact so far I believe we'd always use /bin/sh, but we definitily
>don't. For the sake of a unified environment, and to reduce problems
>(as the one in the qt-3.0.2-1 package which wouldn't build for tcsh
>users)
Currently, all scripts in .info files (e.g. InstallScript,
CompileScript, etc.) are executed by the user's shell! This is not
good of course, as it means we get different results if the user uses
tcsh vs bash vs zsh vs whatever.
In fact so far I believe we'd always use /bin/sh, but we definiti
