Re: [Fink-devel] Status of 10.2 tree

2003-11-18 Thread Ben Hines
FinkCommander works fine with both the 3.3 tree and panther, so that is not a reason at all. -Ben On Nov 18, 2003, at 12:40 AM, Louis Granboulan wrote: Hello, there is also FinkCommander that many fink users (including me) have as their main interface to fink, and that apparently is not bein

Re: [Fink-devel] Status of 10.2 tree

2003-11-18 Thread David R. Morrison
There are still some packages, maybe 100-200, which haven't yet made it from the 10.2 tree to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. As soon as they are moved, we'll stop officially supporting the old 10.2 tree, and we'll explicitly announce this to users. However, for all practical purposes, that support is over

Re: [Fink-devel] Status of 10.2 tree

2003-11-18 Thread Louis Granboulan
Hello, there is also FinkCommander that many fink users (including me) have as their main interface to fink, and that apparently is not being upgraded to gcc3.3 and neither to Panther. This is another reason to support the 10.2 tree. Louis -

[Fink-devel] Status of 10.2 tree

2003-11-17 Thread Daniel Macks
I was under the impression that the 10.2 tree was officially still-supported/not-dead, but in not-being-upgraded mode and users were being urged to install gcc3.3 and switch to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. Based on bug reports, it seems like many folks are not upgrading to gcc3.3 (perhaps "why bother" or