Re: [Fink-devel] Updating pcre revisited

2007-01-31 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Daniel Johnson wrote: > I've done some testing and encountered no issues, but I'd appreciate > it if others could test as well. I can confirm, for example, that > bluefish built against pcre 4.5 works fine with pcre 7.0. Postfix and > nmap also seem to work. > > I've put the info file in my

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating pcre revisited

2007-01-28 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Johnson wrote: > While upstream hasn't rigorously followed libtool versioning > guidelines, even if they had, the install_name would still not have > changed since 4.5 since CURRENT and AGE would still be the same. > > I've done some testi

[Fink-devel] Updating pcre revisited

2007-01-28 Thread Daniel Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A while ago I had suggested updating pcre to something not so prehistoric, but at the time concerns were raised about library compatibility. Recently. I looked closely at the current version, 7.0, and compared it to Fink's 4.5. I can't find any r