On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:19:01AM +0200, "D. H?hn" wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> > For example:
> >
> > Package: foo-%type_raw[crypto]
> > Type: crypto (ssl tls)
> > License: (%type_raw[crypto] = ssl) Restrctive, GPL
> >
> > for a program "foo" that can use different crypto back-ends a
On May 6, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I think I've been quite consistent putting the conditional expression
*before* the thing the conditional controls.
Depends: (%type_pkg[perl] < 581) time-hires-pm (>= 1.50-1)
ConfigureParams: (%type_pkg[ssl]) --with-ssl
Note that the versioning req
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:21:55AM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On May 6, 2005, at 4:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> >Any thoughts about a syntax like:
> >
> > License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
> >
> >where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
On May 6, 2005, at 4:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Any thoughts about a syntax like:
License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
License types? The result is the Lic of the first true cond
encountered in the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel Macks wrote:
> For example:
>
> Package: foo-%type_raw[crypto]
> Type: crypto (ssl tls)
> License: (%type_raw[crypto] = ssl) Restrctive, GPL
>
> for a program "foo" that can use different crypto back-ends and whose
> own program is
Any thoughts about a syntax like:
License: (cond1) Lic1, (cond2) Lic2, ..., (condN) LicN, LicX
where cond* are each usual condional syntax and Lic* are each standard
License types? The result is the Lic of the first true cond
encountered in the list. A final non-conditional LicX would be
requir
