Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-17 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jack Howarth wrote: > JP, >Do you know what sort of change fink is suppose to implement > to eliminate the need for this hack? I recall that Jeremy's > announcement indicated that this was a temporary change to > Xquartz. the latest version of fin

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Can you file a bug for me on this? I can change Xquartz to not claim a dock icon when -version is run... --Jeremy On Dec 15, 2007, at 16:20, Merle Reinhart wrote: Also, Xquartz -version does the interesting focus/dock effect whether X11.app (and the Xserver) is running or not (I'm using

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Merle Reinhart
Also, Xquartz -version does the interesting focus/dock effect whether X11.app (and the Xserver) is running or not (I'm using Terminal obviously since xterm requires the Xserver, however, I can see the same effect in an xterm window). Merle On Dec 15, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Merle Reinhart wrote

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Merle Reinhart
Running Xquartz -version definitely causes the effect that I see when running some of the fink commands. Merle On Dec 15, 2007, at 6:41 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: Fink could be running Xquartz -version, and with the nasty new hack that Jeremy just put in Xquartz would register with the

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread John Davidorff Pell
Fink could be running Xquartz -version, and with the nasty new hack that Jeremy just put in Xquartz would register with the window server to become active and gain focus. Only, Xquartz exits so quickly (since -version just prints to console and doesn't *actually* start the server) that the

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Jack Howarth
JP, Do you know what sort of change fink is suppose to implement to eliminate the need for this hack? I recall that Jeremy's announcement indicated that this was a temporary change to Xquartz. Jack On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 03:41:27PM -0800, John Davidorff Pell wrote: > Fink could

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Daniel Macks
Wonder if it's one of fink's Notify actions? dan On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:19:57PM -0500, Merle Reinhart wrote: > Yip. I see the same thing. Also if you look, the focussed window > flashes slightly at the same time as the dock thing. > > I haven't been able to figure out what fink might be

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-15 Thread Merle Reinhart
Yip. I see the same thing. Also if you look, the focussed window flashes slightly at the same time as the dock thing. I haven't been able to figure out what fink might be doing that would trigger this. So, far, some of the fink commands is the only time I've noticed it (simplest is a fin

Re: [Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-14 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:05 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >Is anyone else noticing the following? On my dual G5 under 10.5.1 > with the X11 2.1.1 pkg installed, I see a weird artifact in the dock > during builds with fink. At certain points during the build process, > it appears for a moment as if the

[Fink-devel] X11-2.1.1.pkg oddity with fink builds

2007-12-14 Thread Jack Howarth
Is anyone else noticing the following? On my dual G5 under 10.5.1 with the X11 2.1.1 pkg installed, I see a weird artifact in the dock during builds with fink. At certain points during the build process, it appears for a moment as if the Dock is being expanded to allow for a new icon (which nev