On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
[]
I wouldn't object to synchronizing the version numbers of the GCC
3.1 virtual package and the real package. Currently the virtual
one is at version '3.1' and the real one uses the build number
'1175', it
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
[]
I wouldn't object to synchronizing the version numbers of the GCC 3.1
virtual package and the real package. Currently the virtual one is at
version '3.1' and the real one uses the build number '1175', it should
be possible to have them both use '1:3.1-1175' for exam
On 8/23/05, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> An XCode Legacy Tools package is now available on ADC which provides, among
> other things, gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 3.1 fo
On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:On Aug 23, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: An XCode Legacy Tools package is now available on ADC which provides, among other things, gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 3.1 for Tiger (and Panther). If a Tiger user installs this, fink will want to install it
On Aug 23, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
An XCode Legacy Tools package is now available on ADC which
provides, among other things, gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 3.1 for Tiger (and
Panther). If a Tiger user installs this, fink will want to install
it's gcc3.1 package since it's version number
An XCode Legacy Tools package is now available on ADC which provides,
among other things, gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 3.1 for Tiger (and Panther).
If a Tiger user installs this, fink will want to install it's gcc3.1
package since it's version number is higher than the virtual gcc3.1
package. This is
