Re: [Fink-devel] apache 2.0.52 and svn 1.1.0

2004-10-14 Thread Blair Zajac
TheSin wrote: It is coming, because of the problems in Florida where Dustin the maintainers lives it's is just behind a little. Great. Thanks for the update. Blair -- Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/ ---

Re: [Fink-devel] apache 2.0.52 and svn 1.1.0

2004-10-14 Thread TheSin
It is coming, because of the problems in Florida where Dustin the maintainers lives it's is just behind a little. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 14-Oct-04, at 11:13 AM, Blair Zajac wrote: Apache 2.0.50 is still in Fink and there have

Re: [Fink-devel] apache 2.0.52 and svn 1.1.0

2004-10-14 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Blair Zajac wrote: | Apache 2.0.50 is still in Fink and there have been a number of security | issues fixed in 2.0.51 and 2.0.52. | | | So I'm thinking we should update Apache and then get Subversion up to | 1.1.0. | Even though I might be repeatin

[Fink-devel] apache 2.0.52 and svn 1.1.0

2004-10-14 Thread Blair Zajac
Apache 2.0.50 is still in Fink and there have been a number of security issues fixed in 2.0.51 and 2.0.52. Changes with Apache 2.0.52 *) SECURITY: CAN-2004-0811 (cve.mitre.org) Fix merging of the Satisfy directive, which was applied to the surrounding context and could allow access de