> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Daniel Johnson
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>> Daniel,
>> Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info
>> packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in the
>> 10.9
> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> Daniel,
> Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info
> packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in the
> 10.9-libc++ tree with a BuildDepends on libboxcore0.2 or libboxcore0.3.
Daniel,
Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info
packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in
the 10.9-libc++ tree with a BuildDepends on libboxcore0.2 or libboxcore0.3.
Jack
-
