On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 02:57 PM, Max Horn wrote:
It also apparently caused problems for some packages, maybe as you say
only for gcc2 using packages, but that makes not much difference to
me. IMO it is definitly not a good idea to just unconditionally use
ccache all the time for
At 14:43 Uhr -0800 14.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Perhaps the time to mention this was when i asked on fink-devel. I
made sure to ask. Noone objected.
I am sorry then, I totally must have missed that mail then (can
happen if you get 200-300 mails/day).
The ONLY problems i have had with ccache
Perhaps the time to mention this was when i asked on fink-devel. I made
sure to ask. Noone objected.
The ONLY problems i have had with ccache has been with gcc2 packages.
In fact I plan to remove those gcc2 symlinks so it only affects gcc3. I
am quite certain that, as you claim, ccache does NOT
