Re: [Fink-devel] compatibility version and package name

2006-10-13 Thread David Reiser
On Oct 12, 2006, at 11:53 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:46:26PM -0400, David Reiser wrote: >> If the compatibility version of a library changes, does that mean the >> package name must change? > > No. But... > >> e.g., libofx-0.7.0 (from package libofx1) provides libofx.1.0

Re: [Fink-devel] compatibility version and package name

2006-10-12 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:46:26PM -0400, David Reiser wrote: > If the compatibility version of a library changes, does that mean the > package name must change? No. But... > e.g., libofx-0.7.0 (from package libofx1) provides libofx.1.0.0.dylib > having compatibility version 2.0.0 > libofx-0.

[Fink-devel] compatibility version and package name

2006-10-12 Thread David Reiser
If the compatibility version of a library changes, does that mean the package name must change? e.g., libofx-0.7.0 (from package libofx1) provides libofx.1.0.0.dylib having compatibility version 2.0.0 libofx-0.8.2 (new upstream version) provides libofx.3.0.0 having compatibility version 4.0.