Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-23 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 23.03.03 um 03:20 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines: On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:40 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: To summarize, I believe a separate crypto tree is still useful in Fink. Even if Apple has purchased a licence or permit to distribute openssl along with Mac OS X, for example, in

Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:40 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: To summarize, I believe a separate crypto tree is still useful in Fink. Even if Apple has purchased a licence or permit to distribute openssl along with Mac OS X, for example, in Russia, I'm pretty sure that permit would not automa

Re: [Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Carsten Klapp
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:33 pm, Max Horn wrote: I'd be interested to know: does Apple ship this with all version of Mac OS X in the whole world (I seriously don' know, this not a flame bait). Neither you nor me probably know this, since we both are in countries which are not affected

[Fink-devel] crypto tree; legal issues

2003-03-22 Thread Max Horn
Changing the subject line as this is now really a different discussion. Ben suggested that we abolish the crypto/ tree. Disclaimer: I didn't originally invent the crypto/ tree thingy, it was there before I even joined Fink. Also note that for me, and also for Ben Hines, there are no legal issue