[Fink-devel] db3 / db4

OK, I just moved readline to stable, and also neon. Now, what about db3 / db4 ? Can we move those? I had no problem reports on them for a long time. MAx -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890

Re: [Fink-devel] db3/db4

At 8:20 Uhr +0900 18.02.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >I thought that it was against policy to have stuff in /sw/include >with the same name as stuff in /usr/include. :) It's not really against any policy. In the case of db it has some pros and cons, but I guess it's better to not add this symlin

Re: [Fink-devel] db3/db4

I thought that it was against policy to have stuff in /sw/include with the same name as stuff in /usr/include. :) Does this package check for db_185.h? This isn't in /usr/include and could be symlinked in the db package. Does subversion require db3/4 or would it be happy with db in libSystem?

[Fink-devel] db3/db4

I wonder, would it make sense for those two packages to put a symlink from /sw/include/db?/db.h to /sw/include/db.h ? Compiling subversion required that, otherwise it used the db.h from /usr/include, which isn't nice. I know I could have fixed this by forcing it to use -I/sw/include/db4 in its