Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-10 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Alexander, > If we are seriously going to deprecate the usage of the /usr/X11 > and /usr/X11R6 symlinks, a better and more automated approach would be > implementing this directly in fink. Detection of a BuildDepends > x11-dev would be

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-10 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:26 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> >> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:11 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Alexander Hansen >> wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> >>> Alexander, >>> So we are taking the po

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-10 Thread Jack Howarth
Alexander, If we are seriously going to deprecate the usage of the /usr/X11 and /usr/X11R6 symlinks, a better and more automated approach would be implementing this directly in fink. Detection of a BuildDepends x11-dev would be used as a trigger for appending -I/usr/X11/include (for 10.7/10.8

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:11 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: >> >> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> Alexander, >> So we are taking the position that users shouldn't be expected to >> reinstall Xquartz after OS X

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Jack Howarth
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Alexander, >So we are taking the position that users shouldn't be expected to > reinstall Xquartz after OS X reinstalls? >Jack > >> > > Do they need to? If on

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Alexander, >So we are taking the position that users shouldn't be expected to > reinstall Xquartz after OS X reinstalls? >Jack > > Do they need to? If only the convenience symlink is missing, then that’s idiotic.

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Jack Howarth
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> Alexander, >> I take it that only the enhanced Command Line Tools checks and >> not those X11/Xquartz made it into fink 0.38.4? If I move aside >> /usr/include, the new error

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Alexander, So we are taking the position that users shouldn't be expected to reinstall Xquartz after OS X reinstalls? Jack On Monday, February 9, 2015, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jack Howarth > wrote: > > > > Alexander, > > I take it th

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Alexander, > I take it that only the enhanced Command Line Tools checks and > not those X11/Xquartz made it into fink 0.38.4? If I move aside > /usr/include, the new error occurs as expected when building a package > with fink... > > %

[Fink-devel] fink 0.38.4

2015-02-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Alexander, I take it that only the enhanced Command Line Tools checks and not those X11/Xquartz made it into fink 0.38.4? If I move aside /usr/include, the new error occurs as expected when building a package with fink... % fink -m -K rebuild xft2-dev Information about 10424 packages read i