Dear all,
I come from reading the threads about 0.5.0 Update and the Fink survey.
It seems to me that there are (at least) two different approaches about
the future of Fink in people minds. I try to phrase them and would like
to start a discussion about it.
(1) Fink is for unix users who switc
On Friday, November 29, 2002, at 08:57 PM, William McCallum wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies,
"fink validate" errors on .deb file or info fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Same here. We really need a good packaging HOWOT that summarizes this
all; then we add a standard answer to the tracker that points to that
HOWTO.
Since I do not do any packaging and know little about it, it would be
nice if you could supply
At 15:20 Uhr -0800 26.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:05 PM, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the
submission tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check
At 17:36 Uhr -0800 25.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies, "fink validate"
errors on .deb file or info file etc, etc, etc
> >
> > Works fine for me in chimera. :)
> >
> > Matt
> >
> In between crashes ;-) Sorry...couldn't resist ;-)
>
I don't think I've had Chimera crash on me since .6 release. And I run
nightlies
--
JD
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Works fine for me in chimera. :)
Matt
In between crashes ;-) Sorry...couldn't resist ;-)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redi
This would be a lot easier if OmniWeb stopped calling everything it downloaded from the trackers "download.php". Can this be fixed?
I am incredibly annoyed by that as well. It is a bug in their server, i believe, but they don't seem to care:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=5688
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:05 PM, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for obvious things like shared library
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies, "fink validate"
errors on .deb file or info file
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies, "fink validate"
errors on .deb file or info fil
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies, "fink validate" errors
on .deb file or info file etc, etc, etc. I get rather tired of
explaining the same thin
Dave,
Perhaps those of us (like me) who submit fairly straightforward
packages that more or less compile out of the box could help in dealing
with the submission of like packages. One of the big honchos would
still have to do the assignment of packages, but then we could do the
routine checkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Montag, November 25, 2002, at 10:03 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Please don't drop out, if this describes you! We'll try to work out
better ways of incorporating your efforts into Fink.
I can only attest to what David has already been s
The discussion earlier, plus some private emails I received, got me thinking
some more about what Fink needs at this point.
Actually, it's not *just* that we need volunteers; we need a more effective
way of using the talents of people who are willing to volunteer.
Just to give one example: the wa
16 matches
Mail list logo
