Re: [Fink-devel] number of distribution

2002-12-06 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Freitag, Dezember 6, 2002, at 10:21 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote: On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 06:58 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: The actual 0.5.0 distribution is going to be a slight modification of the one which is already there, includin

Re: [Fink-devel] number of distribution

2002-12-06 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 06:58 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: The actual 0.5.0 distribution is going to be a slight modification of the one which is already there, including fink-0.11.1-1 and apt-0.5.4-7. The question is, should I just call it 0.5.0 even though it's changed, or should I

[Fink-devel] number of distribution

2002-12-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear fink-devel folks, As some of you are aware, sourcefiles for the 0.5.0 distribution were put up at sourceforge around 10 days ago, and were publically accessible for a day or less. (They are still accessible, but there is no longer a URL which points to them.) The actual 0.5.0 distribution i