Re: [Fink-devel] packages tested under 10.2

2002-10-04 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 01:35 pm, Nicholas Robbins wrote: > Both worked fine, but I don't know that I would notice if > something were wrong with imlib. Also, Finlay Dobbi's sf > address bounces, anyone know if he has a new address? Ick, sorry about that. Should be fixed now :-) Howeve

Re: [Fink-devel] packages tested under 10.2

2002-10-04 Thread Nicholas Robbins
These packages don't have maintainers, and refered instead to this list: imlib 1.9.10-9 (also -shlibs) xv 3.10a-2 Both worked fine, but I don't know that I would notice if something were wrong with imlib. Also, Finlay Dobbi's sf address bounces, anyone know if he has a new address? - Nichola

Re: [Fink-devel] packages tested under 10.2

2002-10-03 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 09:35 AM, Nicholas Robbins wrote: > I still don't know to whom I should report packages tested > under 10.2 > > To the maintainer of the package. Who else? "fink info packagename" -Ben --- This sf.net em

Re: [Fink-devel] packages tested under 10.2

2002-10-03 Thread Nicholas Robbins
I still don't know to whom I should report packages tested under 10.2 - Nicholas Robbins _ "A Freudian slip is when you say one thing but mean your mother." -Anon. _ --- T

[Fink-devel] packages tested under 10.2

2002-09-28 Thread Nicholas Robbins
Where should I send the list of packages I've installed in 10.2 that function? - Nicholas Robbins "I have the heart of a small boy -- and I keep it in a jar on my desk." -Stephen King ---