Re: [Fink-devel] polite prebinding

2003-10-22 Thread David R. Morrison
Martin, That warning would be more easily understood if it were worded differently. Instead of "prebinding not disabled because foo overlaps with bar" it should say "prebinding not disabled even though foo overlaps with bar". Normally, an overlap would cause the linker not to prebind, but we're te

Re: [Fink-devel] polite prebinding

2003-10-21 Thread Benjamin Reed
Martin Costabel wrote: Compiling xfree86-cvs under 10.2-gcc3.3 I get tons of warnings of the type ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x6000) of ./libSM.6.0.dylib~ overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1) of /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE

[Fink-devel] polite prebinding

2003-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
Compiling xfree86-cvs under 10.2-gcc3.3 I get tons of warnings of the type ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x6000) of ./libSM.6.0.dylib~ overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1) of /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.6.dylib Why does it wa