> New pygobject is broken several ways (including some that are
> different between py25 and py26). I'm not eager to push more use of
> things that rely on packages that bus-error on real-world use and even
> their own self-tests:(
>
> dan
Sorry, I didn't know. (It works fine with coot, fwiw).
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:41:42AM -0800, William G. Scott wrote:
> Dear Daniel et al:
>
> Would it be possible to have a version of pygtk2 for python2.6? I
> made the substitution in the Type field and it appears to be ok.
New pygobject is broken several ways (including some that are
differen
Dear Daniel et al:
Would it be possible to have a version of pygtk2 for python2.6? I
made the substitution in the Type field and it appears to be ok.
Thanks.
Bill Scott
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcF
