Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
[]
> I just committed the new revision in cvs.
Thanks. Now everything looks right.
--
Martin
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 10:36 PM, Martin Costabel a écrit :
> Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>>
>> Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:44 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
>>
The Conflicts is correct, it is followed by a Replaces so one
*can* upgrade
>>>
>>> Is it? Did you test it to verify?
>>
>>
Sylvain, the problem (as a few people have pointed out) is that you cannot
include the Conflicts lines in readline and readline-shlibs. You need
the Replaces lines, but not the conflicts lines.
(The reason is: if the current readline "conflicts" with an earlier version
of readline, upgrading won
Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:44 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
>
> >> The Conflicts is correct, it is followed by a Replaces so one
> >> *can* upgrade
> >
> > Is it? Did you test it to verify?
>
> yes, I just tested it by removing readline readline-shlibs, then
Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:44 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
>> The Conflicts is correct, it is followed by a Replaces so one
>> *can* upgrade
>
> Is it? Did you test it to verify?
yes, I just tested it by removing readline readline-shlibs, then
install readline-4.2, then install r
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:44:48PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
> At 21:22 Uhr +0100 17.02.2002, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
> >Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:01 PM, Martin Costabel a écrit :
> >
> >>Not me in any case. It's Sylvain who is testing :-)
> >>I hope he finishes soon. Readline is pretty essential
Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
> The Conflicts is correct, it is followed by a Replaces so one *can*
> upgrade
Then why
1) does it not work for me nor for Olivier?
2) none of the other 15 -shlibs*.info has such a Conflicts: line?
--
Martin
___
Fink-de
At 21:22 Uhr +0100 17.02.2002, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:01 PM, Martin Costabel a écrit :
>
>>Not me in any case. It's Sylvain who is testing :-)
>>I hope he finishes soon. Readline is pretty essential for fink.
>
> yes sorry about all that testing
No, I am not
"Olivier M." wrote:
> mmm, in the mean time, is there a way to remove the buggy readline
> and to replace it with the "standard" version ? (from apt-get install).
> Tried a few things, but I don't see a way without removing all
> packages needing readline.
fink install readline-4.2-3
--
Martin
Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 09:01 PM, Martin Costabel a écrit :
> Not me in any case. It's Sylvain who is testing :-)
> I hope he finishes soon. Readline is pretty essential for fink.
yes sorry about all that testing, a working (I hope =) revision is
now in cvs
the -compat
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:01:37PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> "Olivier M." wrote:
> > well, that's a lot of packages... is this non-backward-compatible
> > update really necessary, or are you just testing :) ?
>
> Not me in any case. It's Sylvain who is testing :-)
> I hope he finishes soon.
"Olivier M." wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:21:29PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> > > Failed: can't install package readline-shlibs-4.2a-2
> >
> > The new readline/readline-shlibs package cannot be upgraded to without
> > applying force or removing all packages that depend on readline.
>
At 19:04 Uhr +0100 17.02.2002, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 06:17 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
>
>>1) Why this change?
>
> The previous version (4.2) was mantained by chrisP and he had
>to manually create shared libs because readline didn't support
>darwin. This by-hand shar
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:21:29PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> > Failed: can't install package readline-shlibs-4.2a-2
>
> The new readline/readline-shlibs package cannot be upgraded to without
> applying force or removing all packages that depend on readline.
well, that's a lot of packages..
"Olivier M." wrote:
> readline-shlibs conflicts with readline (<< 4.2a-2)
This is the bug. Why is there a "Conflicts: readline (<< 4.2a-2)" in
readline-shlibs*.info? The result is
> Failed: can't install package readline-shlibs-4.2a-2
The new readline/readline-shlibs package cannot be upgrade
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 07:08:54PM +0100, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
> > just for info, the update to latest readline libs broke
> > some things on my system, especially the bash :/
>
> Yes that's because the compatibility version has been downgraded.
> Everything that depends on readline ha
Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 06:23 PM, Olivier M. a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 05:56:39PM +0100, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>> I've just updated readline to readline & readline-shlibs. Below is
>> the list of maintainers that should change their Depends: readline to
>
> just for info, th
Le dimanche 17 février 2002, à 06:17 PM, Max Horn a écrit :
> 1) Why this change?
The previous version (4.2) was mantained by chrisP and he had to
manually create shared libs because readline didn't support darwin. This
by-hand shared libraries has 4.2.0 compatibility version.
myXtie on the IRC channel had the same problem. He had to rebuild bash
and gnucash to make everything work.
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, at 12:23 PM, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 05:56:39PM +0100, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>> I've just updated readline to readline & readline-shlib
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 05:56:39PM +0100, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
> I've just updated readline to readline & readline-shlibs. Below is
> the list of maintainers that should change their Depends: readline to
just for info, the update to latest readline libs broke
some things on my system, espe
At 17:56 Uhr +0100 17.02.2002, Sylvain Cuaz wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I've just updated readline to readline & readline-shlibs.
>Below is the list of maintainers that should change their Depends:
>readline to
>
>Depends: readline-shlibs
>BuildDepends: readline
>
>Please note that the compatibility v
Hi,
I've just updated readline to readline & readline-shlibs. Below is
the list of maintainers that should change their Depends: readline to
Depends: readline-shlibs
BuildDepends: readline
Please note that the compatibility version of the previous library (4.2)
was 4.2.0
[r21m246:~]
22 matches
Mail list logo
