On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Chris Dolan wrote:
>> I have mailed the developer and asked him which version we can use.
>> For now I'll leave it at 0.69.
>>
>> - Koen.
>
> FYI, this was due to a bug in CPAN. CPAN recently introduced a
> feature to prevent people from hijacking namespaces and it
On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
>>> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://
>>> search.cpan.org/
>>>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
>> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
>> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
>
Koen van der Drift wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
> 0.60a is listed on cpan.
>
> Is it ok to down
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
> 0.
Hi,
Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
0.60a is listed on cpan.
Is it ok to downgrade the package in fink, or will that
On Jul 2, 2005, at 12:16 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
No...the *default* for Type:perl has not changed, and probably will
not, since that would mean different people would get different .deb
depending on which fink they used to build it. The easiest
implementation appears to be: use the default, the
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:17:18PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:39 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> >INSTALLMAN3DIR=%p/lib/perl5/%type_raw[perl]/man/man3
>
> Is this already handled by the %{default_script}?
No...the *default* for Type:perl has not changed, and proba
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:39 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
INSTALLMAN3DIR=%p/lib/perl5/%type_raw[perl]/man/man3
Is this already handled by the %{default_script}?
thanks,
- Koen.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
Koen,
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See spreadsheet-
writeexcel-pm.info for a simple example. Note that there should
perhaps also be a -man splitoff.
-man splitoffs are not needed very often any more, due to the "new"
Thanks guys. Chris' suggestion seems somewhat easier to implement, so
I'll give that one a go.
- Koen.
On Jun 28, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See
spreadsheet-writeexcel-pm.info for
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See spreadsheet-
writeexcel-pm.info for a simple example. Note that there should
perhaps also be a -man splitoff.
On Jun 27, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
During the installation o
Koen,
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See
spreadsheet-writeexcel-pm.info for a simple example. Note that there
should perhaps also be a -man splitoff.
Chris
On Jun 27, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
During the installation of soap-lite-pm586, I got an e
Hi,
During the installation of soap-lite-pm586, I got an error for some
conflicting files that were already installed by soap-lite-pm581:
/sw/bin/SOAPsh.pl
/sw/bin/SOAPsh.pl
sw/bin/XMLRPCsh.pl
So I edited the .info file (there is no maintainer listed) and changed
the Replaces field from:
R
14 matches
Mail list logo
