On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Chris Dolan wrote:
>> I have mailed the developer and asked him which version we can use.
>> For now I'll leave it at 0.69.
>>
>> - Koen.
>
> FYI, this was due to a bug in CPAN. CPAN recently introduced a
> feature to prevent people from hijacking namespaces and it
On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
>>> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://
>>> search.cpan.org/
>>>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
>> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
>> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
>
Koen van der Drift wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
> 0.60a is listed on cpan.
>
> Is it ok to down
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
> I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
> dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
> 0.
Hi,
Just noticed that the current version of soap-lite-pm in fink, which
I maintain, is not available anymore on cpan (http://search.cpan.org/
dist/SOAP-Lite/). The package database lists version 0.69, but only
0.60a is listed on cpan.
Is it ok to downgrade the package in fink, or will that
