On Oct 20, 2003, at 6:19 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
However, additional contributions to the 10.3 tree, particularly of new
versions of packages whose 10.2-gcc3.3 version didn't build, would be
That would be pretty tough to do on 10.3 since most of the dependencies
aren't in the 10.3 tree yet
On Monday, Oct 20, 2003, at 09:19 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote:
emboss
I am the current maintainer of emboss. The version that is in unstable
(2.7.1-4) builds fine on 10.2-gcc33, so I guess the one you are
referring to is 2.6.0 that is in stable? I've had enough good replies
from users,
> That would be pretty tough to do on 10.3 since most of the dependencies
> aren't in the 10.3 tree yet. I'd have to move all them over. If you
> want that help, you should move the working packages into the 10.3 tree
> now.
>
> Anyway, waiting makes it too difficult for me to contribute, so I
David R. Morrison wrote:
Here's an update on the current state of the 10.3 tree.
Currently, the 10.3 tree has only a very few things in it. A few are
"placeholder" packages which allow fink to use some new components of
the system in 10.3 which were not present in 10.2. Others are 10.3-specific
Here's an update on the current state of the 10.3 tree.
Currently, the 10.3 tree has only a very few things in it. A few are
"placeholder" packages which allow fink to use some new components of
the system in 10.3 which were not present in 10.2. Others are 10.3-specific
revisions of packages.
I
