Re: [Fink-devel] updating Fink's lilypond

2013-03-02 Thread Matthias Neeracher
On Feb 28, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: Recent upstream patches to lilypond now allow it to build with clang. I've taken those patches and updated the lilypond and lilypond-devel pkgs to the latest released versions. I've attached the new files

[Fink-devel] updating Fink's lilypond

2013-02-28 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Matthias, Recent upstream patches to lilypond now allow it to build with clang. I've taken those patches and updated the lilypond and lilypond-devel pkgs to the latest released versions. I've attached the new files to this message. The only thing missing in the 10.7 tree is dblatex which

Re: [Fink-devel] updating Fink's lilypond

2013-02-28 Thread Max Horn
Hi Hanspeter, sorry for not responding to your previous email on dblatex :-(. On 28.02.2013, at 16:07, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Matthias, Recent upstream patches to lilypond now allow it to build with clang. I've taken those patches and updated the lilypond and lilypond-devel pkgs

Re: [Fink-devel] updating Fink's lilypond

2013-02-28 Thread Matthias Neeracher
Thanks for your quick answer, Max! On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:31 AM, Max Horn m...@quendi.de wrote: sorry for not responding to your previous email on dblatex :-(. On 28.02.2013, at 16:07, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Recent upstream patches to lilypond now allow it to build with clang. I've

Re: [Fink-devel] updating Fink's lilypond

2013-02-28 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 2/28/2013 6:31 PM, Max Horn wrote: I have no plans to port dblatex to 10.7, because in order to do that, I would have to install tetex-base (or perhaps the texlive-base package, which didn't exist back when I packaged dblates). But I have no desire to install either a TeX system from the