Re: [Fink-devel] vim-nox binary from Fink 0.6.1 dependency problem

2003-11-14 Thread David R. Morrison
> Is libqt-mt from qt3-shlibs still linked with the xfree-86-4.2.1 > libfreetype? This would still break it for Panther users and force them > to recompile qt3 themselves. I rebuilt 0.6.2 from scratch, using the identical source files as in 0.6.1 (except for updates to fink, fink-prebinding, apt

Re: [Fink-devel] vim-nox binary from Fink 0.6.1 dependency problem

2003-11-14 Thread Martin Costabel
On vendredi, nov 14, 2003, at 14:38 Europe/Paris, David R. Morrison wrote: I'm sorry to say that 0.6.2 binaries are, in almost every case, identical to 0.6.1 with one important exception: the files are now owned by root rather than by UID 2011. (The incorrect ownership arose from a "feature" o

Re: [Fink-devel] vim-nox binary from Fink 0.6.1 dependency problem

2003-11-14 Thread David R. Morrison
Martin, I'm sorry to say that 0.6.2 binaries are, in almost every case, identical to 0.6.1 with one important exception: the files are now owned by root rather than by UID 2011. (The incorrect ownership arose from a "feature" of hfs+ which was unknown to me: it turns out that a non-root hfs+ volu

Re: [Fink-devel] vim-nox binary from Fink 0.6.1 dependency problem

2003-11-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Fred wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to report a bug, installing the vim-nox binary from a fresh Fink 0.6.1 installs dlcompat as a dependency, but does not install dlcompat-shlibs rendering it non-functional. Manually installing dlcomat-shlibs gets everything going again. I already suggested some

[Fink-devel] vim-nox binary from Fink 0.6.1 dependency problem

2003-11-13 Thread Fred
Hi all, I just wanted to report a bug, installing the vim-nox binary from a fresh Fink 0.6.1 installs dlcompat as a dependency, but does not install dlcompat-shlibs rendering it non-functional. Manually installing dlcomat-shlibs gets everything going again. Fred -