On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:43 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Greetings, fink developers.
>
> There have been a number of threads over the past few months about the
> fate of the stable branch. I want to start a new one, in which I will
> make a different proposal than the ones made in the past.
>
> F
David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
> Now it is true that there hasn't been a bindist in two years, and
> there has never been one for 10.5.
I want to add an argument to this discussion that I haven't heard
recently, although it has (or should have) been staring us in the face
for a long time:
Ther
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:43:11PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Greetings, fink developers.
>
> There have been a number of threads over the past few months about the
> fate of the stable branch. I want to start a new one, in which I will
> make a different proposal than the ones made in
Am Fr, 13.06.2008, 02:43, schrieb David R. Morrison:
> Greetings, fink developers.
>
[...]
>
> So here's my proposal. When the pango-cairo-branch is merged back, we
> put all of the *active* files from that branch immediately into the
> stable tree. Now this is going to cause problems for stabl
Fully agree, basically, only small comments below ..
On 13 Jun 2008, at 02:43, David R. Morrison wrote:
> There have been a number of threads over the past few months about the
> fate of the stable branch. I want to start a new one, in which I will
> make a different proposal than the ones made
Greetings, fink developers.
There have been a number of threads over the past few months about the
fate of the stable branch. I want to start a new one, in which I will
make a different proposal than the ones made in the past.
From my point of view, the stable branch might well be named the
