Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

2003-02-10 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > > I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in > > experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned > > dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (t

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

2003-02-10 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

2003-02-10 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: packages, but if anyone has any ideas please speak up now. Also please consider how we will tell users to perform this upgrade - should it be via a shell script like the one I've created? I offered one idea already. Will it not

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

2003-02-10 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Folks: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r --force-depends to remove the 4.2.1.1 packages. I've also