At 4:13 Uhr -0700 11.05.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>At 7:07 AM -0400 5/11/02, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> > Of course i suppose we'd have to update every package
>>
>>Not necessarily. If the Source-MD5 field is present, fink should check
>>against it; if not, fink would let the download through. It
At 7:07 AM -0400 5/11/02, David R. Morrison wrote:
> > Of course i suppose we'd have to update every package
>
>Not necessarily. If the Source-MD5 field is present, fink should check
>against it; if not, fink would let the download through. It then would
>be up to the maintainers of packages to
> Of course i suppose we'd have to update every package
Not necessarily. If the Source-MD5 field is present, fink should check
against it; if not, fink would let the download through. It then would
be up to the maintainers of packages to add this if they wanted.
-- Dave
At 11:51 AM +0200 5/11/02, Max Horn wrote:
>At 23:49 Uhr -0700 10.05.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>>Just checked in puf, a parallel URL fetching utility. We might
>>consider it as a downloader for fink.
>>
>>To solve the "what if one fails?" problem we could check to see if
>>the files exist in src af
At 23:49 Uhr -0700 10.05.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>Just checked in puf, a parallel URL fetching utility. We might
>consider it as a downloader for fink.
>
>To solve the "what if one fails?" problem we could check to see if
>the files exist in src after puf exits.
That's only useful if we first in
