Re: [Fink-devel] Patch for 10.5 Binary Installer

2008-02-03 Thread Evan Broder
(Sorry - this is in the scripts module if that's not clear) - Evan Evan Broder wrote: > Hi, > I think I've got a patch that fixes the postflight script on 10.5. > > There are two things that I fix: first, ps axww seems to for some reason > list lots of processes on 10.5. I will freely admit

Re: [Fink-devel] Patch for 10.5 Binary Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Evan Broder wrote: > Hi, > I think I've got a patch that fixes the postflight script on 10.5. > > There are two things that I fix: first, ps axww seems to for some reason > list lots of processes on 10.5. I will freely admit that I don't > understand the options to ps on OS X or any other pl

Re: [Fink-devel] Patch for 10.5 Binary Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Evan Broder
Martin Costabel wrote: > Good catch. To me this looks like a bug in Leopard's /bin/ps: When the > "-a" flag is present, it ignores the "-p pid" flag. I have immediately > filed a bug with Apple's bugreporter. > > The environment variables (in particular $HOME and $USER) with which the > insta

Re: [Fink-devel] Patch for 10.5 Binary Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Martin Costabel wrote: > > Good catch. To me this looks like a bug in Leopard's /bin/ps: When the > "-a" flag is present, it ignores the "-p pid" flag. I have immediately > filed a bug with Apple's bugreporter. I imagine that it will be closed as invalid. With -a, you are essentially asking fo

Re: [Fink-devel] Patch for 10.5 Binary Installer

2008-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] > > I imagine that it will be closed as invalid. With -a, you are > essentially asking for all processes with a controlling terminal, with > -p you ask for all processes which match the given process id. ps will > return both all the processes with a controlling terminal a