Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2008-01-04 Thread Jonathan Stickel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > On 02 Jan 2008, at 23:02, Alexandre Vial wrote: > >> Jonathan Stickel a écrit : >>> Corey >>> >>> The latest octave-forge.info (20071212-1005) has a couple bugs. >>> >>> First, the perl command for correcting the octave_packages file does not >>> work correctly, r

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2008-01-03 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 02 Jan 2008, at 23:02, Alexandre Vial wrote: > Jonathan Stickel a écrit : >> Corey >> >> The latest octave-forge.info (20071212-1005) has a couple bugs. >> >> First, the perl command for correcting the octave_packages file >> does not >> work correctly, resulting in octave not recognizing th

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2008-01-02 Thread Alexandre Vial
Jonathan Stickel a écrit : > Corey > > The latest octave-forge.info (20071212-1005) has a couple bugs. > > First, the perl command for correcting the octave_packages file does not > work correctly, resulting in octave not recognizing that any packages > are installed. > > Second, the pkg prefixe

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-08-23 Thread Jean-Francois Mertens
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Jean-Francois Mertens wrote: >> Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >>> There is still something to fix in %p/share/octave/ls-R; >>> 1) to make sure (PostInstScript) it gets re-updated correctly >>> 2) perl -pi -e 's,%i,%p,' >>> >> > I've been using this now for

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-08-23 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Jean-Francois Mertens wrote: > Jean-François Mertens wrote: > >> There is still something to fix in %p/share/octave/ls-R; >> 1) to make sure (PostInstScript) it gets re-updated correctly >> 2) perl -pi -e 's,%i,%p,' >> > > I've been using this now for a while--it seems OK. One thing tha

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-10 Thread Jean-Francois Mertens
Jean-François Mertens wrote: > There is still something to fix in %p/share/octave/ls-R; > 1) to make sure (PostInstScript) it gets re-updated correctly > 2) perl -pi -e 's,%i,%p,' No _ checked: this is a file of octave, and the refs are to octave's blddir. And the pkg seems functional w/o updating

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-10 Thread Jean-Francois Mertens
Jean-François Mertens wrote: > There is still something to fix in %p/share/octave/ls-R; > 1) to make sure (PostInstScript) it gets re-updated correctly > 2) perl -pi -e 's,%i,%p,' No _ checked: this is a file of octave, and the refs are to octave's blddir. And the pkg seems functional w/o updating

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-10 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 10 Jul 2007, at 12:22, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >> On 08 Jul 2007, at 07:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >>> >>> On 05 Jul 2007, at 23:22, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> The current version of octave in 10.4/unstable has gone to a package mana

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-10 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > On 08 Jul 2007, at 07:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > >> >> On 05 Jul 2007, at 23:22, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >>> The current version of octave in 10.4/unstable has gone to a package >>> management system of its own to regulate installation of components of >>

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-07 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 08 Jul 2007, at 07:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > On 05 Jul 2007, at 23:22, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> The current version of octave in 10.4/unstable has gone to a package >> management system of its own to regulate installation of >> components of >> the octave-forge extensions. How

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge for octave-2.9.x

2007-07-07 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 05 Jul 2007, at 23:22, Alexander Hansen wrote: > The current version of octave in 10.4/unstable has gone to a package > management system of its own to regulate installation of components of > the octave-forge extensions. However, it also appears to be > possible to > do a monolithic version

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-3

2005-03-27 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2005-03-26, Christophe Favergeon wrote: > Failed: compiling octave-forge-2004.02.12-3 failed Try selfupdating. The latest version of octave-forge is 2004.11.16-5, which should fix this problem. If a selfupdate doesn't cure this, please run fink rebuild octave-forge 2>&1 | tee log

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2004-10-08 Thread Corey Halpin
Christian Schaffner wrote: > On 08.10.2004, at 00:05, Corey Halpin wrote: > >> octave-forge informed me today that it wants a maintainer. >> >> I'll volunteer for that, if nobody else wants it. > > > I just noticed that you already have commit access to cvs. So, why don't > you just go ahead

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2004-10-07 Thread Christian Schaffner
On 08.10.2004, at 00:05, Corey Halpin wrote: octave-forge informed me today that it wants a maintainer. I'll volunteer for that, if nobody else wants it. I just noticed that you already have commit access to cvs. So, why don't you just go ahead and add your name? Chris. -

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge

2004-10-07 Thread Christian Schaffner
Hi Corey On 08.10.2004, at 00:05, Corey Halpin wrote: octave-forge informed me today that it wants a maintainer. I'll volunteer for that, if nobody else wants it. That would be great. Do you have any updates for the packages (that you want to put on the submission tracker) or shall i just put

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-3

2004-05-19 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On May 19, 2004, at 11:13 AM, Fabiano Sarracco wrote: I got the following error while installing Setting up fink (0.20.1-1) ... Checking system... powerpc-apple-darwin7.3.0 Since you have gcc 3.3 installed, fink must be bootstrapped or updated using that compiler. However, you currently have g

Orphaned packages (Was Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-2)

2004-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
On April 19, 2004, Mathieu GUILLAUME wrote: [] galois.cc:1282: error: `TBM' undeclared (first use this function) [] Failed: compiling octave-forge-2004.02.12-2 failed I succeed in installing this package from source for octave 2.1.53-1 (stable) but not for octave 2.1.57-2 (unstable). On April 26,

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-2

2004-03-25 Thread Matthias Neeracher
On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Building octave-forge crashes for me because of a bad interaction with lilypond (maintainer CCed): Lilypond installs a texinfo.tex file that gets substituted for the real thing. This breaks texinfo which is used for building octave-forge. I had

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-2

2004-03-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Linc Davis wrote: With this package installed, I get the following error every time I run apt: You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: octave-forge: Depends: X11 but it is not installable. For Fink users, this of

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-2

2004-03-18 Thread Christian Schaffner
On 18.03.2004, at 10:06, Yael Maguire wrote: can't compile - problem with pngread.cc Thanks for the feedback. However, we will need more information to help you. Could you send the compile output with the exact error number? Chris. thanks and great job overall! Yael Maguire -- Package manager v

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-1

2004-03-10 Thread Christian Schaffner
Hi Michael On 08.03.2004, at 21:32, Michael Kluskens wrote: fink install octave-forge gives: ... ld: warning -prebind has no effect with -bundle ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull make[2]: *** [tsearch.oct] Error 1 make[1]: *** [geometry/] Error 2 make: *** [main/] Error 2 ### execution of make f

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-1

2004-03-09 Thread jfm
On Mar 8, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Michael Kluskens wrote: fink install octave-forge gives: ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull Thanks for the reminder _ the issue came up already before. Fixed in cvs. (if you can't wait, just add in the info file a line SetLIBRARY_PATH: %p/lib ) JF Mertens --

Re: [Fink-devel] Octave-forge: To add or not to add path...

2003-01-17 Thread Per Persson
On fredag, jan 17, 2003, at 13:52 Europe/Stockholm, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Maybe even better to make package octave add some lines to the global startup script to check for the presence of a file named 'octave-forge-path' and read it. Jeff, comments? I vote for this last solution - and putting

Re: [Fink-devel] Octave-forge: To add or not to add path...

2003-01-17 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Per Persson wrote: > Hi, > I just subitted an upated package for octave-forge to the tracker. > > There is one part that I don't particularly like and would like some > feedback on: > Octave-forge is a set of extensions to octave and must have its path > added to octave's sear