[Fink-devel] fink and CVS?

2003-10-09 Thread Greg Novak
> The simplest thing to do is to simply add this as an alternative method. > But we were just discussing on #fink a more drastic change: we could > scrap anonymous cvs access altogether, and offer only two access > methods, rsync or ext cvs (the latter for fink developers only). Has CVS been scra

RE: [Fink-devel] fink and CVS?

2003-10-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
No, that's just the server--it's having problems again. Keep trying. -- Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Novak Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:04 AM To

RE: [Fink-devel] fink and CVS?

2003-10-09 Thread Kaben Nanlohy
Or switch to the rsync update method. Download and unpack http://fink.opendarwin.org/fink/fink-0.14.0.tar.gz, then "cd fink-0.14.0; sudo ./inject.pl /sw", then "fink selfupdate-rsync". On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > No, that's just the server--it's having problems again. Keep

Re: [Fink-devel] fink and CVS?

2003-10-09 Thread Darian Lanx
Kaben Nanlohy said the following on 10/9/03 12:57 PM: Or switch to the rsync update method. Download and unpack http://fink.opendarwin.org/fink/fink-0.14.0.tar.gz, then "cd fink-0.14.0; sudo ./inject.pl /sw", then "fink selfupdate-rsync". Just a note on this. Please be advised that this method i

[Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for all users. (Anonymous CVS at sourceforge has become unresponsive AGAIN...) Thanks, Dave ---

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
I tried out selfupdate-rsync and it worked fine. However, I switched back to authenticated CVS because I wanted a package that wasn't yet available on the opendarwin mirror--anonymous CVS users probably wouldn't see a major change. I guess modifying the documentation would be in order, once th

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le jeudi, 9 oct 2003, à 15:11 Europe/Paris, David R. Morrison a écrit : Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for all users. (Anonymous CVS at sourceforge has become unresponsiv

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Christian Schaffner
On Donnerstag, Oktober 9, 2003, at 03:11 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for all users. (Anonymous CVS at sourceforge has become unresponsiv

[Fink-devel] Re: reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Pedro Massobrio
'fink selfupdate-rsync' work well in my system. Rgds, Pedro --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Clic

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread mlist-fink
* David R. Morrison wrote (Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:11:46AM -0400): > Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable Built it from source (using bootstrap.sh) and begun a fresh installation of the fink system. Been using the rsync method. No problems. -- jeremy avnet

[Fink-devel] Are you running panther, and do you have no regard for your current Fink installation?

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Then I need you! =) I just posted instructions to my blog on how to do some panther testing with Fink. If you're interested in helping out, please follow the instructions here: http://ranger.befunk.com/blog/archives/000246.html Like it says there, please don't post about problems with this

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Kaben Nanlohy
Works. Side effects of prebinding queue caught me by surprise, but it's pretty neat. On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, David R. Morrison wrote: > Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable > soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method > for

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Kaben Nanlohy wrote: Works. Side effects of prebinding queue caught me by surprise, but it's pretty neat. Are you on 10.2? Or 10.2-gcc3.3? If the former, then something's wrong, you shouldn't get prebinding stuff unless you're on the gcc3.3 branch (which is the 0.14.1 beta). -- Benjamin Reed

[Fink-devel] Are you on 10.2, and want to help us get panther-ready?

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
The 10.2-gcc3.3 tree is the testing ground for what will become the Panther tree; while we plan on continuing to support Jaguar even after Panther is released, the eventual goal is to only support gcc3.3 on either platform. You can help us get gcc3.3 and Panther ready if you're running 10.2 by

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Yarden Livnat
does selfupdate-rsync support 10.2-gcc3.3 ? I noticed that fink-0.14.0 changed my dists link back to 10.2 Yarden On Oct 9, 2003, at 9:49 AM, Pedro Massobrio wrote: 'fink selfupdate-rsync' work well in my system. Rgds, Pedro --- This SF.ne

[Fink-devel] Broken link in Fink's packaging manual

2003-10-09 Thread Michel Schinz
Dear Fink developers, Just a quick note to tell you that the link pointing to the Debian manual about package versions, found in section 5.2 of the Fink packaging manual, is broken. It currently points to: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-versions.html but should (IMO) point to: h

[Fink-devel] openssl vs. Panther

2003-10-09 Thread Chris Pepper
With 6b78, fink (updated from CVS) fails to build openssl: vsigntca.pem => 18d46017.0 making all in test... cc -I../include -fPIC -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -O3 -D_DARWIN -DB_ENDIAN -fno-common -I/sw/include -c -o bntest.o bntest.c LD_LIBRARY_PATH=..:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH \ cc -o bntest -I../include -fP

RE: [Fink-devel] Broken link in Fink's packaging manual

2003-10-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Looks reasonable to me--it's changed now. -- Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michel Schinz Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

[Fink-devel] (CORRECTION) Are you on 10.2, and want to help us get panther-ready?

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Benjamin Reed wrote: The 10.2-gcc3.3 tree is the testing ground for what will become the Panther tree; while we plan on continuing to support Jaguar even after Panther is released, the eventual goal is to only support gcc3.3 on either platform. You can help us get gcc3.3 and Panther ready if yo

[Fink-devel] Re: Panther vs. glib2 & openssl

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Chris Pepper wrote: At 9:55 AM -0400 2003/09/30, Benjamin Reed wrote: Not everything will work, and likely anything you build there will have incompatibilities with what gets released officially from Fink as far as panther support, so be prepared to start over when we have something that's wor