Re: [Fink-users] emacs21 dependency error

Jason J. Park wrote: > I did a 'fink selfupdate-cvs' and tried to install emacs21-21.2-6.info > in stable. emacs21, however, depends on emacsen-common, which currently > is only in unstable. Just for the record - you certainly have seen it by now - emacsen-common is in stable now, too. -- M

Re: [Fink-users] giflib Download problems

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm having trouble installing pretty much anything because I can't get > libungif or giflib. Each time I try to install something I need to pick > one or the other, and, of course, I do. I've tried both, but each time I > get an error... when trying to download them,

[Fink-users] emacs21 dependency error

I did a 'fink selfupdate-cvs' and tried to install emacs21-21.2-6.info in stable. emacs21, however, depends on emacsen-common, which currently is only in unstable. Jason Park --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, a

[Fink-users] giflib Download problems

I'm having trouble installing pretty much anything because I can't get libungif or giflib. Each time I try to install something I need to pick one or the other, and, of course, I do. I've tried both, but each time I get an error... when trying to download them, curl can't change to the directo

[Fink-users] KDE: multiple definitions of symbol _main

Hi I have installed KDE by using the binaries and I have MOSX10.1.5. Now, when I start e. g. konqueror, I have the following error messages: localhost% konqueror kdeinit: Launched DCOPServer, pid = 5998 result = 0 Could not find start_launcher: dlcompat: dyld: /sw/bin/kdeinit mu

Re: [Fink-users] rsync vs. rsyncX (e.g)

At 13:57 Uhr +0200 09.07.2002, Stefan Berreth wrote: >Dear all, > >first of all, FINK rocks! > >but: can anybody explain to me why the rsync version installed by fink is >not the HFS+ filesystem enhanced version of rsync? (see www.macosxlabs.org/rsyncx/rsyncx.html>) > [...] >- is there a good re

Re: [Fink-users] (no subject)

I'm sorry...it works well... On mardi, juillet 9, 2002, at 09:59 , Arthur Petit wrote: > hi, i've got a problem with apt-get... > > I'm running MacOSX 10.1.2 > Package manager version: 0.9.12 > Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs > > it says that: > > > [m31:~] arthur% sudo apt-get install xfree86

[Fink-users] (no subject)

hi, i've got a problem with apt-get... I'm running MacOSX 10.1.2 Package manager version: 0.9.12 Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs it says that: [m31:~] arthur% sudo apt-get install xfree86-base Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done W: Couldn't stat source package list f

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

What version of the dev tools? ('cc -v') What OS version? ('sw_vers') What version of make? ('make -v') What Fink version? ('fink --version') Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

/usr/bin/make On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 02:31 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 03:23 PM, John Melby wrote: > >> I am on an HFS+ partition. > > > What does 'which make' say? === John Melby Emeritus Professor of Music University of Illinois at Urban

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 03:23 PM, John Melby wrote: > I am on an HFS+ partition. What does 'which make' say? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

I am on an HFS+ partition. On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To: John Melby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem > > If you are on a UFS filesystem the XFree86 build won't work - you

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

If you are on a UFS filesystem the XFree86 build won't work - you have to build it on a HFS+ partition or install the binary package. -Jeff On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Melby wrote: > I seem to remember that this problem was dealt with in a thread several > months ago, but I don't have the informat

[Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

I seem to remember that this problem was dealt with in a thread several months ago, but I don't have the information where I can easily get at it. I'm trying to install xfree86-base with fink, and I consistently get the following error: __ making imake with BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS= in config/i

Re: [Fink-users] Unstable arb package fails to install

Wow - having been forced to remove and recompile libtiff, libpeg and libpng, I got a satisfactory install. Thanks! > You'll undoubtedly find that a "fink remove libjpeg" will fail as the > libjpeg package is a dependency for a bunch of other packages. > However, you can use the "--force-remove"

Re: [Fink-users] rsync vs. rsyncX (e.g)

On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 07:57 AM, Stefan Berreth wrote: > This leads to > the situation that you cannot truely backup (and successfully > restore!) a > MaxOSX folder or even drive with the plain vanilla unix tools when there > are carbon applications and their data files in it. I thought

[Fink-users] rsync vs. rsyncX (e.g)

Dear all, first of all, FINK rocks! but: can anybody explain to me why the rsync version installed by fink is not the HFS+ filesystem enhanced version of rsync? (see ) With MacOSX, apple has moved to HFS+ for the formerly UFS based NeXTStep operatingsystem. Most of the common unix tools that d