Re: [Fink-users] Gnome Update Problem - Unstable Tree

2002-08-02 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 10:16 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Maybe you could try following this advice, i.e. sudo dpkg -i --auto-deconfigure /gnome-mime- data_2.0.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb Or else, dpkg --remove --force-depends gnome-vfs-ssl. This should break out of the catch-22 situation,

[Fink-users] ksh93-20020628-1 man page

2002-08-02 Thread Jason J . Park
I've tested out ksh93-20020628-1 in unstable and it seems to work well. I do have a small nit with this package. When viewing the man page, the ksh command is referred to as sh. I don't really know anything about how man pages are formatted, but I opened it and it seems like it can be confi

[Fink-users] Xman displaying as Postscript?

2002-08-02 Thread Jeremy Erwin
I was messing about with xman, and I discovered that the overwhelming majority of man files are displayed as postscript source (i.e. %PS-Adobe-3.0 ...) The only exception seems to be dx, although that's probably because I also installed the catl files to accompany the actual manl pages. Is th

Re: [Fink-users] Nobody? Compiling evolution failed...

2002-08-02 Thread Pedro Massobrio
Max, Thanks for your quick reply. Here is the result: 151 [Sao @/Users/pm] % fink list gtkhtml Information about 1344 packages read in 1 seconds. i gtkhtml 1.0.2-2 HTML rendering/printing/editing engine. i gtkhtml-dev 1.0.2-2 HTML rendering/printing/editing engine. i

[Fink-users] Can't Build koffice/kdelibs3-ssl

2002-08-02 Thread segment289
I'm trying to build koffice 1.2beta2-2, and it keeps failing on kdelibs3-ssl-3.0.2-1 (I chose the defaults for the dependencies): sudo /sw/bin/fink install koffice Information about 1350 packages read in 0 seconds. pkg koffice version ### pkg koffice version 1.2beta2-2 fink needs help picking

Re: [Fink-users] Problem Installing Evolution

2002-08-02 Thread Max Horn
At 10:00 Uhr -0700 02.08.2002, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: >I am trying to install Evolution. I search both stable and unstable >trees, and I just did an update from CVS. I get the following error >message: > >curl -f -L -s -S -O >ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/source/evolution/evolution-1.0.7.tar.gz >cu

Re: [Fink-users] Nobody? Compiling evolution failed...

2002-08-02 Thread Max Horn
What do you get when you do a: fink list gtkhtml Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:

[Fink-users] Nobody? Compiling evolution failed...

2002-08-02 Thread Pedro Massobrio
MacOS X 10.1.5 December Developer Tools GNU Make version 3.79 fink --version Package manager version: 0.9.12 Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs As I got no answer before, I post again...maybe I get lucky this time. I'm using: Trees: local/main unstable/main unstable/crypto stable/main stable/crypto

Re: [Fink-users] Problem Installing Evolution

2002-08-02 Thread scmarcos
At 10:00 AM -0700 8/2/02, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: >I am trying to install Evolution. I search both stable and unstable trees, and I just >did an update from CVS. I get the following error message: > >curl -f -L -s -S -O ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/source/evolution/evolution-1.0.7.tar.gz >curl: (19)

[Fink-users] Re: Looking for feedback on unstable packages

2002-08-02 Thread Christian Schaffner
Hi Stephen I need to get some feedback from people using those packages in fink on MacOS X. If we get some positive feedback on the packages we can move them to the 'stable' tree of fink. Chris. At 10:53 Uhr -0700 2.8.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Christian Schaffner wro

Re: [Fink-users] Problem Installing Evolution

2002-08-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
The kind folks (sarcasm) at Ximian have updated their official release to 1.0.8 and deleted the 1.0.7 tarball. I faced the same problem a couple of versions ago, but wasn't able to find one anywhere on their site. The best thing I could come up with was to wait until the fink maintainer came

Re: [Fink-users] dcopidl missing in kdelibs-ssl binary package?

2002-08-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
It should be there (our package is called kdelibs3-ssl). I installed from binary, and do have /sw/bin/dcopidl . Try reinstalling kdelibs3-ssl. By the way, dcopidl is provided by the splitoff package kdelibs3-ssl-dev . On Friday 02 August 2002 13:24, Philipp Sasse wrote: > Hi, > > I did insta

[Fink-users] dcopidl missing in kdelibs-ssl binary package?

2002-08-02 Thread Philipp Sasse
Hi, I did install the binary package bundle-kde-ssl, that should contain kdelibs-ssl, that does normaly (usually I run kde3 on solaris) contain an executable called dcopidl. This does not seem to be part of the binary release. Is there a reason for this? This should be needed for compiling th

[Fink-users] Problem Installing Evolution

2002-08-02 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
I am trying to install Evolution. I search both stable and unstable trees, and I just did an update from CVS. I get the following error message: curl -f -L -s -S -O ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/source/evolution/evolution-1.0.7.tar.gz curl: (19) evolution-1.0.7.tar.gz: No such file or directory

Re: [Fink-users] Installing Evolution - What am I getting?

2002-08-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Friday 02 August 2002 11:29, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: > Evolution looks like a very nice program. I ws going to install it, > but I found that Fink wanted to install 99 new files, and there were > several options, and I wasn't certain how all of this would affect my > system. First, what are th

[Fink-users] Installing Evolution - What am I getting?

2002-08-02 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
Evolution looks like a very nice program. I ws going to install it, but I found that Fink wanted to install 99 new files, and there were several options, and I wasn't certain how all of this would affect my system. First, what are the tradeoffs of using the SSL and non-SSL versins, the LZW v

[Fink-users] Re: Looking for feedback on unstable packages

2002-08-02 Thread Stephen Turner
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Christian Schaffner wrote: > Hi > > I am the maintainer of the following packages still in the unstable > tree and would love to get some feedback so that we can move them to > the stable tree: > > analog-5.24-1 > anonlog-1.0-1 > dbi-pm-1.280-1 > neon21-0.21.2-1 > neon21-s

[Fink-users] Looking for feedback on unstable packages

2002-08-02 Thread Christian Schaffner
Hi I am the maintainer of the following packages still in the unstable tree and would love to get some feedback so that we can move them to the stable tree: analog-5.24-1 anonlog-1.0-1 dbi-pm-1.280-1 neon21-0.21.2-1 neon21-ssl-0.21.2-1 texi2html-1.64-1 Thanks, Chris. ---

Re: [Fink-users] ....dammit.....

2002-08-02 Thread Rich Grenyer
On 2/8/02 12:58 pm, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is so odd - my email server has trimmed the signatures off the bottom of every fink-users email I've ever had. Thanks! Rich > Rich Grenyer wrote: >> Can someone tell me how to change my subscription options so I get the >> d

Re: [Fink-users] ....dammit.....

2002-08-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Rich Grenyer wrote: > Can someone tell me how to change my subscription options so I get the > digest form of this list? I know this is a simple question, but I > /cannot/ find anything on the fink pages that resembles a mailman config > page... > What's wrong with https://lists.sourceforge.n

[Fink-users] ....dammit.....

2002-08-02 Thread Rich Grenyer
Title: dammit. Can someone tell me how to change my subscription options so I get the digest form of this list? I know this is a simple question, but I cannot find anything on the fink pages that resembles a mailman config page...