Re: [Fink-users] xfree86/KDE problem

Tilman Kispersky wrote: [] dyld: xinit can't open library: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmuu.1.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) This is a FAQ: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-packages.php#libXmuu (which doesn't mean anyone knows why this happens). -- Martin ---

[Fink-users] xfree86/KDE problem

Hello, I used dselect to install bundle-kde (3.0.7-7) and all its dependencies (ie. xfree86). When I type "startx -- -fullscreen" I get this error message: bash-2.05a$ startx -- -fullscreen dyld: xinit can't open library: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmuu.1.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) /usr

Re: [Fink-users] Help Building MySQL-python?

I was finally successful building MySQL-python after finding an upgraded version, 0.9.2, which will build with threads disabled. Is it correct that the latest fink mysql does not use the threaded libraries? It is another matter to install because you have to figure out which python zope is using a

Re: [Fink-users] fink installed stuff from unstable, when it wasn't in fink.conf

Hi, I tried removing and reinstalling bundle-gnome, and it is the version from stable, but I still have the same error, with gnome-session not being found. Oh well - it's not the first time I've made a new fink installation, so it won't kill me ;-) Cheers, Gavin On Wednesday, March 19, 2003,

Re: [Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

You may have to update some other packages, too, but yes. On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Ned Dupont wrote: > So your saying that I now should be able to run "fink update evolution" and > it should work? > > Ned Dupont > > > Hmm. It should be resolved now (I'm running unstable). > > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003

Re: [Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

Hmm. It should be resolved now (I'm running unstable). On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Ned Dupont wrote: > I use unstable, which may be why I'm having problems. I know, I know. > Unstable means just that, Unstable. So it may very well be my bad. > Anyway, I have tried it both ways. By installing evolution,

Re: [Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

So your saying that I now should be able to run "fink update evolution" and it should work? Ned Dupont > Hmm. It should be resolved now (I'm running unstable). > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Ned Dupont wrote: > >> I use unstable, which may be why I'm having problems. I know, I know. >> Unstable mean

Re: [Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

I use unstable, which may be why I'm having problems. I know, I know. Unstable means just that, Unstable. So it may very well be my bad. Anyway, I have tried it both ways. By installing evolution, gtkhtml was installed. Then, when upgrading, gtkhtml1.1 fails. I also tried installing gtkhtml1.1 firs

[Fink-users] GNOME Pilot Tools

Hello all. I have recently installed evolution and would like to start Syncing it with my Palm Pilot. I installed J-Pilot, which I assumed would somehow aid in syncing with evolution, but evolution tells me that the GNOME Pilot Tools are not installed. When I do a "fink list pilot", Only jpilot an

Re: [Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

Well, they are different versions of the same stuff. The reason for the separate packages is that evolution-1.2 requires gtkhtml-1.1, but some of the other packages require an earlier version. My recollection is that there were some packages that had an erroneous dependency on gtkhtml (rather than

Re: [Fink-users] fink installed stuff from unstable, when it wasn'tin fink.conf

Ouch! You make a clear case for just copying the .info/.patch files over to local when you want to play around with unstable. You may not need to blow all of fink away. Try this: 1) Verify that bundle-gnome points to the stable version with "fink list bundle-gnome" 2) If so, try installing bu

[Fink-users] What's the deal gtkhtml and gtkhtml1.1?

This might be a stupid question but when I try to install something that requires gtkhtml1.1, why does the install fail with an error telling me that gtkhtml1.1 conflicts with gtkhtml? This is really stupid. Is fink not smart enough to simply upgrade to gtkhtml1.1? Or are these two gtkhtml's comple

Re: [Fink-users] Kde 3.1

I'd suggest Fink Commander as a useful aid in this case, because then you can see the current stable versions of all of the packages. That way you can do any downgrading you need to. On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Rich Warren wrote: > Now that kde 3.1 Is in stable, what's the best way to switch fink from

[Fink-users] fink installed stuff from unstable, when it wasn't in fink.conf

Hi, I edited my fink.conf to contain unstable, so I could install fix-fink, and rebuild things linked against the outdated libpng. After installing fix-fink, I then edited my fink.conf back, to remove the unstable paths. I then ran fix-fink, and it appears to have resulted in lots of things

[Fink-users] libtool 1.3.5 patched?

Hi, I read in the fink "Unix Porting Guide" about the problems with libtool. It seems to say that libtool 1.4 in Fink CVS is patched, but implies that libtool 1.3.5 is not patched. Do I need to apply the patch mentioned to libtool 1.3.5? or is this already done for me? The link to the page

[Fink-users] Kde 3.1

Now that kde 3.1 Is in stable, what's the best way to switch fink from unstable to stable? -Rich- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What

[Fink-users] Problems with gnome-libs

I'm having problems installing gnome-libs-1.4.2-5 with Fink. I get the error messages below when it compiles. What needs to be done to get this to compile successfully? Thanks, Greg rm -f .libs/gnome-metadata.lo gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./.. -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I../support -I.

Re: [Fink-users] netpbm versioning

On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Not really. I believe that the conflict would be between netpbm and > netpbm10, but only one of these gets installed. The -shlibs can > coexist. Here's what I have on my system: > > i netpbm 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs

[Fink-users] Re: Apple X11 or not?

Ronny Wikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd very much appreciate if someone please could sum up the > reasons pro and con to use either Apple's X11 or the fink > XFree86 version? It has been asked and answered before (around the time of both beta 1 and beta 2). I'm convinced you can find the ma

Re: [Fink-users] EPS ghostscript

On tiistai, maalis 18, 2003, at 10:33 Europe/Helsinki, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin von Weissenberg wrote: FWIW, I removed all fink ghostscript installations, installed the ESPGS package manually, then installed system-ghostscript-7.05-3. Seems to work fine. [] On maanantai, maalis 17, 2003,

Re: [Fink-users] rpm-4.0.4-1 failed to build

Kow K wrote: A build of rpm-4.0.4-1 failed on Fink 0.5.1.cvs, 0.12.1 running on 10.2.4, with the following error. Any ideas? ... -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.1/Home/../ ../../Headers -c javaglue.c -fno-common -DPIC -o javaglue.lo javaglue.h:6: header file 'jni.h'

Re: [Fink-users] Apple X11 or not?

Personally, I am avoiding Apple's X11 until it comes out of beta. Fink's is stable (mostly) and I would prefer to avoid the compatibility issues until they are all ironed out. Hi! I'd very much appreciate if someone please could sum up the reasons pro and con to use either Apple's X11 or the f

[Fink-users] Apple X11 or not?

Hi! I'd very much appreciate if someone please could sum up the reasons pro and con to use either Apple's X11 or the fink XFree86 version? Thanks in advance, - Ronny Wikh --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?