[Fink-users] g95

2003-07-13 Thread Sébastien Maret
I read on the g95 project page (http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/), that the compiler, even not complete, is working yet. Does somebody manage to compile it on darwin ? Would it be possible to include it into Fink, or is it still at too early stage of development ? Sebastien -- Sebastien Maret

Re: [Fink-users] g95

2003-07-13 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Sébastien: Even though it is still at a very early stage of development, I plan to create a fink package as soon as the CVS tree is merged into the tree-ssa branch of gcc CVS (should be sometime this summer). -Jeff On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Sébastien Maret wrote: I read on the g95 project page

Re: [Fink-users] swig linker error?

2003-07-13 Thread Geoffrey A. Washburn
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, jfm wrote: I've had this since all times _ here follows a excerpt from a msg of last october to the maintainer, with an appropriate patch you can use. (He didn't have other reports of this at that time _ and I didn't look at it any further since) This solved the

Re: [Fink-users] can't make fink believe stuff needs to be updated

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Geoff Smith wrote: I have fink installed, but only version 0.12.1-1, or 0.5.2 (not really sure about the numbering scheme). The results of a fink selfupdate follow: This was a known bug in fink 0.12.1. See

Re: [Fink-users] gnotime compile failing: used from dynamic library....not from earlier dynamic library

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:05 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote: nt. So here's why I'm stuck compiling it. I'm gettin a whole slew of errors like this: # symbol _Load_Device used from dynamic library /sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.dylib(ftxopen.lo) not from earlier dynamic library

Re: [Fink-users] will fink purge remove its changes made to Netinfo after an install of passwd?

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 05:20 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You wouldn't be able to remove passwd until you remove everything else, since it's a base package. I'm not sure if fink purge takes out the daemon users, but it should, by rights. base packages CAN be removed. Only 'Essential'

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error

2003-07-13 Thread Ben Hines
We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since they do not work and it is fixable. -Ben On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:46 AM, jfm wrote: On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error [Forwarded from: jsw@cdc.noaa.gov]

2003-07-13 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Ben Hines wrote: We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since they do not work and it is fixable. -Ben I would wait and see if it is fixed in the Panter Dev Tools. I'll bet you a

[Fink-users] python and tkinter...

2003-07-13 Thread Jonas Roel
does anyone know where I can find tkinter for my python2.2 installation? Thanks, Jonas --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book.