Can anyone explain why emacs is doing the following formatting of its
Info directory?
Here's a sample:
* Flex: (flex). A fast
scanne
r
genera
tor.
* sed: (sed).Stream
EDitor
.
* Glossary: (music-glossary). Glossa
ry
After a lengthy search of the fink-users archives, it seems this
problem has gone totally unanswered. I can't compile netpbm-10.18-2; it
dies in the make install phase, due to some funkiness in the man
directory paths. I've contacted the package manager about this, but I
haven't heard back from
Unlike g77 3.4, which still fails to build under fink
on my G5 with 10.2-gcc3.3, I was able to modify the same
.info file to build gcc 3.3.2's g77 and it seems to
package up fine. I uncommented the make check-g77 for the
build and got...
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected pass
I'm running fink on panther, but just a little concerned about the note
that 0.5.3 does not "support" 10.3.
All seems to run fine here, is there anything i should be watching out for?
I don't run the whole distribution, just a few tools here and there that
i miss from my days running linux.
TIA
-d
I fink I see what you mean ;)
see:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fink
:D
--
Dan White
---
Hi,
The new ddd version (3.3.7-1) in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree failes during the
configure phase:
configure: configuring in libiberty
configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --prefix=/sw '--prefix=/sw'
'--mandir=/sw/share/man' '--infodir=/sw/share/info'
'--disable-dependency-tracking' 'CPPFLAGS=-
I currently have fink 1.5.1-beta and 10.2-gcc3.3 installed
on my G5 running 10.2.8. Does anyone know what the recommended
approach will be to convert a fink 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3 once
the machine is upgraded to Panther? Thanks in advance for any
clarifications on this.
Jack
see:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fink
:D
- Koen.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you
The -beta releases of fink are designed to bootstrap you into 10.2-gcc3.3,
not 10.2. In fact, that's the only difference between the beta release
and the official release whose minor version number is one lower.
Once we are ready for the official release of 10.2-gcc3.3, there will be some
code in
For the postfix problem: the missing header file is part of the db3
package. Did that get installed? You may need to reinstall db3.
For libbonobo2, the missing file is from esound. This looks like a
missing BuildDepend in the .info file.
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 12:44 PM, Michael
Thanks for the info, Jack. I actually have a functional g77 on my G5:
Reading specs from /sw/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin6.8.5/3.4/specs
Configured with: '../gcc-3.4-20030827/configure' '--prefix=/sw
'--enable-languages=f77 '--infodir=/share/info
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4 20030827 (exp
Charles,
If you download gcc 3.3.2, it should build fine on your G5
and show the same make check as on the gcc testsuite mailing
list for Darwin 6.3. I did some quick benchmarks last night
of g77 3.3.2 vs 3.4 and couldn't detect any speed improvement.
I did find out one interesting tidbit on the
Hello,
I'm trying to get up to date again after converting to the rsync update
method, and I'm running
Package manager version: 0.15.0
Distribution version: 0.5.3.cvs
on a BronzeG3PowerBook, 10.2.3, Dec2002 DevTools.
apologies if I havent included enough of the logs below...
Compile problems wit
Well, I managed to get g77 to build on my PowerBook, simply by building
fink's bison and using that rather than Apple's. The Apple version in
/usr/bin is somewhat older, so maybe that caused the problem on my
PowerBook. The fix didn't work on my G5, though. I still get the same
problem.
I a
I'm not sure what might be different about my system that would cause
the previous version to build, but not the current one. I had started
out with gcc 3.1 on the G5 when it first arrived, but didn't build many
packages because I knew I wanted to switch to gcc 3.3 as soon as
possible. As soo
Ok, it is there (a pain that I can search it using the stupid finder).
I tried setting CFLAGS -L/usr/include and LDFLAGS -L/usr/lib , but I
get the same error.
The compiling system can't seem to find the util.h header file. The
only thinking that I can think is that it is a local R file that is
Oh my, my English was atrocious in this post. I just wanted to add that
I am using the fink stable distribution,
so the source code should all compile on the PPC.
On Tuesday, Oct 21, 2003, at 10:14 Europe/Madrid, JP Glutting wrote:
Ok, now I am getting somewhere (although without making any prog
17 matches
Mail list logo
