Re: [Fink-users] removing gnome

2006-07-28 Thread Andrew Hartung
On Jul 28, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > On 7/28/06, Andrew Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I searched the archives and failed to find a solution that worked. >> When I try to remove gnme I get: >> ~ $ fkr gnome-base >> Information about 5937 packages read in 13 seconds. >>

Re: [Fink-users] removing gnome

2006-07-28 Thread Andrew Hartung
On Jul 29, 2006, at 12:23 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > >> You _should_ be able to do a recursive remove via gnome-base. What's >> failing in that case? > > Also, sudo apt-get remove gnome-base should work too... That gives me Reading Pac

Re: [Fink-users] removing gnome

2006-07-28 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > You _should_ be able to do a recursive remove via gnome-base. What's > failing in that case? Also, sudo apt-get remove gnome-base should work too... - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key

Re: [Fink-users] removing gnome

2006-07-28 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 7/28/06, Andrew Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I searched the archives and failed to find a solution that worked. > When I try to remove gnme I get: > ~ $ fkr gnome-base > Information about 5937 packages read in 13 seconds. > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --remove gnome-base > dpkg: dependency pro

Re: [Fink-users] background for KDE

2006-07-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Gary K Olson wrote: > Is there a way to eliminate the KDE background/Wallpaper, so one can > just see the aqua desktop? I have looked the documentation, but I > did not see anything. According to "fink info bundle-kde": You can remove this by disabling desktop icons in the KDE control ce

[Fink-users] removing gnome

2006-07-28 Thread Andrew Hartung
I searched the archives and failed to find a solution that worked. When I try to remove gnme I get: ~ $ fkr gnome-base Information about 5937 packages read in 13 seconds. /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --remove gnome-base dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of gnome-base: gnome-print-shlibs depends

Re: [Fink-users] lyx-qt bug

2006-07-28 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > Jens Noeckel wrote: >> Hi, >> I have lyx-qt 1.4.1-1 installed from unstable with fink 0.8.1.rsync >> i386 on a MacBook Pro, and get a crash when I do a particular >> sequence of steps in lyx. I've reported this to the lyx developers >> but also

Re: [Fink-users] lyx-qt bug

2006-07-28 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Jens Noeckel wrote: > Hi, > I have lyx-qt 1.4.1-1 installed from unstable with fink 0.8.1.rsync > i386 on a MacBook Pro, and get a crash when I do a particular > sequence of steps in lyx. I've reported this to the lyx developers > but also wanted to report it here, in case anyone else experie

[Fink-users] lyx-qt bug

2006-07-28 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, I have lyx-qt 1.4.1-1 installed from unstable with fink 0.8.1.rsync i386 on a MacBook Pro, and get a crash when I do a particular sequence of steps in lyx. I've reported this to the lyx developers but also wanted to report it here, in case anyone else experiences this (i've now checked

Re: [Fink-users] Problems installing soqt21-dev

2006-07-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Philip Ershler wrote: [] > Failed: phase compiling: soqt21-1.2.0-3 failed Any reason why you are still using the 10.4-transitional tree? What you are seeing is probably some effect of it rotting in its grave. On the Fink home page it says that that tree will be officially unsupported from August