[Fink-users] kdebase3-unified-3.5.8-1021 build failiure

2007-11-09 Thread Jonathan Edwards
Fellow Fink Users, After searching around for some information on the following failure, I'm wondering if someone on the mailing list can offer any help. As indicated in the subject line, attempts to build kdebase3- unified-3.5.8-1021are failing: 55% compiling /sw/src/fink.build/kdebase3-u

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 09 Nov 2007, at 19:16, Sebastien Maret wrote: > Maybe I am overlooking something, but why do you need ATLAS on 10.5? > Both BLAS and Lapack libraries (which I think is what ATLAS provides) > are present in /usr/lib since 10.4 (Intel). They were missing on 10.4 > PPC, so I filled out a radar ab

Re: [Fink-users] orbit2 leopard problem

2007-11-09 Thread jmauro
I'm having the same issue with GIOP building of Orbit2. I have glib2-dev 2.12.12-14 currently installed. James > In file included from ../../../include/orbit/GIOP/giop.h:12, > from ../../../include/orbit/orbit.h:15, > from ../../../include/orbit/orb-core/orbit- > interface.h:738, > from orbit-i

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Sebastien Maret
Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good news: 3.8.0-4 built and installed without error and without > modification. Maybe I am overlooking something, but why do you need ATLAS on 10.5? Both BLAS and Lapack libraries (which I think is what ATLAS provides) are present in /usr/lib since 10

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Nov 9, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED] e> wrote: > > On 09 Nov 2007, at 18:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Robert, >>How about identifying the link in the atlas Makefile.in's which >> does that 'rm -f *.o x* config?.out *core*' and just changing it >> to 'rm -fr

Re: [Fink-users] portaudio-18.1-1

2007-11-09 Thread Robert T Wyatt
jack also depends on this (as well as kmail). Just writing to say I have the same error (leopard/intel). I'm happy to test any proposed solutions. --rtw Stefan wrote: > Finished configure. > > Type 'make' to build PortAudio and examples. > make > mkdir lib > gcc -c -g -O2 -Ipa_common -Ipablio

Re: [Fink-users] Patch to compile djvulibre

2007-11-09 Thread Robert T Wyatt
fwiw, this does work for me on leopard/intel (NB: there should be no spaces or line breaks in the pasted text). --rtw Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Gernot Weber wrote: >> Hi, >> >> sould someone of the fink developers please add this line >> > You're much better served sending a message to fink-dev

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Good news: 3.8.0-4 built and installed without error and without modification. Robert T Wyatt wrote: > I'm preparing to test this. Will let you know within an hour or two. > Thanks! > rtw > > Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> On 09 Nov 2007, at 18:18, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> Robert, >>> How

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Robert T Wyatt
I'm preparing to test this. Will let you know within an hour or two. Thanks! rtw Jean-François Mertens wrote: > On 09 Nov 2007, at 18:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Robert, >> How about identifying the link in the atlas Makefile.in's which >> does that 'rm -f *.o x* config?.out *core*' and just

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 09 Nov 2007, at 18:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > Robert, > How about identifying the link in the atlas Makefile.in's which > does that 'rm -f *.o x* config?.out *core*' and just changing it > to 'rm -fr *.o x* config?.out *core*'? > Jack The sed command I suggested

[Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Robert, How about identifying the link in the atlas Makefile.in's which does that 'rm -f *.o x* config?.out *core*' and just changing it to 'rm -fr *.o x* config?.out *core*'? Jack - This SF.ne

Re: [Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Jean-François Mertens
Very sorry, but this looks to me like some sort of file-system corruption. Look what the files should be : -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 24188 Nov 9 18:05 xarchinfo_x86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 76140 Nov 9 18:05 xconfig -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 13356 Nov 9 18:05 xctest -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 2327

[Fink-users] leopard + apache 2.2 + php5

2007-11-09 Thread mikie
hi, hope this is right list for this question... i'm trying to install php5 in leopard with its apache 2.2. why i am doing it is i need support for postgresql. i'm dealing with php 5.2.4. my configure command for php was just: ./configure --with-apxs2 --with-pgsql everything compiles fine

[Fink-users] atlas on leopard/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Robert T Wyatt
I've discussed this off-list a little bit with JFM and am posting here for others to reference and possibly help solve. I'm happy to help test any proposed solution. Here's the error: ATLAS install complete. Examine ATLAS/bin//INSTALL_LOG/SUMMARY.LOG for details. make clean rm -f *.o x* config?.

Re: [Fink-users] Patch to compile djvulibre

2007-11-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gernot Weber wrote: > Hi, > > sould someone of the fink developers please add this line > You're much better served sending a message to fink-devel, since more developers read that list. > SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dylib_file,/System/Library/Frameworks/ > OpenG

Re: [Fink-users] firefox - "Illegal instruction" in run-mozilla.sh

2007-11-09 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 01:46:17AM -0800, Mike O'Brien wrote: > On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: > > > >>Trying to set up or run "firefox" newly-installed by a fresh > >> install of fink, I get: > >> > >> Setting up firefox (1.

[Fink-users] Patch to compile djvulibre

2007-11-09 Thread Gernot Weber
Hi, sould someone of the fink developers please add this line SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dylib_file,/System/Library/Frameworks/ OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib:/System/Library/ Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib to djvulibre.info as line 15. Otherwise the pack

Re: [Fink-users] unstable pdflib build fails on leopard

2007-11-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Deroshia wrote: > The most requested fink package here at the physics department is > grace. However, with leopard, I haven't been able to successfully > build one of its dependencies, pdflib. > > After a fresh bootstrap install of the latest f

Re: [Fink-users] firefox - "Illegal instruction" in run-mozilla.sh

2007-11-09 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Nov 9, 2007, at 4:46 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: On Nov 9, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: Trying to set up or run "firefox" newly-installed by a fresh install of fink, I get: Setting up firefox (1.0.7-1008) ... /sw/lib/firefox

Re: [Fink-users] firefox - "Illegal instruction" in run-mozilla.sh

2007-11-09 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: > >> Trying to set up or run "firefox" newly-installed by a fresh >> install of fink, I get: >> >> Setting up firefox (1.0.7-1008) ... >> /sw/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 7814 Illeg

Re: [Fink-users] firefox - "Illegal instruction" in run-mozilla.sh

2007-11-09 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Nov 9, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Mike O'Brien wrote: > Trying to set up or run "firefox" newly-installed by a fresh > install of fink, I get: > > Setting up firefox (1.0.7-1008) ... > /sw/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 7814 Illegal > instruction "$prog" ${1+"$@"} > > I Googled

[Fink-users] firefox - "Illegal instruction" in run-mozilla.sh

2007-11-09 Thread Mike O'Brien
Trying to set up or run "firefox" newly-installed by a fresh install of fink, I get: Setting up firefox (1.0.7-1008) ... /sw/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 7814 Illegal instruction "$prog" ${1+"$@"} I Googled but didn't see much - any hints? Mike O'Brien --

Re: [Fink-users] install g77 on 10.5/intel

2007-11-09 Thread Gernot Weber
Hi Jack, thanks a lot for pointing this out. Cheers, Gernot On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Gernot, > With the gcc 4.2 release, gfortran is pretty much considered > feature complete as a basic fortran 95 compiler. The g77 backward > compatibility is also considered fin