Re: [Fink-users] arch-tla-1.3.5-1

2008-05-17 Thread Peter Stirling
forgot to add: $ fink --version Package manager version: 0.28.2 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sun May 18 04:26:13 2008, 10.5, powerpc On 18 May 2008, at 4:18 am, Peter Stirling wrote: > Information about 6753 packages read in 1 seconds. > Can't resolve dependency "patch" for package

[Fink-users] arch-tla-1.3.5-1

2008-05-17 Thread Peter Stirling
Information about 6753 packages read in 1 seconds. Can't resolve dependency "patch" for package "arch-tla-1.3.5-1" (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft

Re: [Fink-users] Phase Compile Error in pwlib-1.10.10-2

2008-05-17 Thread James McKenzie
Martin Costabel wrote: > Jean-François Mertens wrote: > [] > >> First, why it did work on 10.4 : recompiling maccoreaudio.cxx with '-H' >> added to the flags yields the following extract >> (showing which header included which one): >> >> .. /sw/.bld/pwlib1-1.10.10-1/pwlib-1.10.10/include/ptlib.

Re: [Fink-users] Phase Compile Error in pwlib-1.10.10-2

2008-05-17 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] > First, why it did work on 10.4 : recompiling maccoreaudio.cxx with '-H' > added to the flags yields the following extract > (showing which header included which one): > > .. /sw/.bld/pwlib1-1.10.10-1/pwlib-1.10.10/include/ptlib.h > ... /sw/.bld/pwlib1-1.10.10-1/pw

Re: [Fink-users] Texmacs Doesn't Work with Maxima 5.15

2008-05-17 Thread Martin Costabel
Sean wrote: > I'm using: maxima-5.15.0-2, texmacs-1.0.6.14-2, fink --version > Package manager version: 0.28.2 > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Fri May 16 16:36:03 2008, 10.5, i386 > > Ok, I know that this is probably an upstream problem that will be > fixed eventually, but I just thought

[Fink-users] Texmacs Doesn't Work with Maxima 5.15

2008-05-17 Thread Sean
I'm using: maxima-5.15.0-2, texmacs-1.0.6.14-2, fink --version Package manager version: 0.28.2 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Fri May 16 16:36:03 2008, 10.5, i386 Ok, I know that this is probably an upstream problem that will be fixed eventually, but I just thought I'd give everyone a head