Re: [Fink-users] gnucash built, doesn't work

2009-03-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
Mark J. Reed wrote: > dyld: Library not loaded: /libgcc_s.1.dylib > Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libssp.0.dylib > Reason: image not found > Trace/BPT trap > > fink 0.28.7 on 10.5.6... any thoughts? > > You've linked to a non-Fink library that seems to have encoded a bad path to libgcc_s.1

[Fink-users] gnucash built, doesn't work

2009-03-04 Thread Mark J. Reed
dyld: Library not loaded: /libgcc_s.1.dylib Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libssp.0.dylib Reason: image not found Trace/BPT trap fink 0.28.7 on 10.5.6... any thoughts? -- Mark J. Reed -- Open Source Business Confe

Re: [Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
Mark J. Reed wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >>> Maybe I'm confused by something else, then. Shouldn't "fink >>> update-all" update all the packages on my system, just as if I'd typed >>> "fink update $pkgname" for each one individually? If not, then what

Re: [Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> Maybe I'm confused by something else, then.  Shouldn't "fink >> update-all" update all the packages on my system, just as if I'd typed >> "fink update $pkgname" for each one individually?   If not, then what >> does it do?  If so, then it

Re: [Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark J. Reed wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: >>> I'm also confused by the fact that I had to update ghostscript >>> explicitly when I just did a selfupdate/update-all yesterday. >> That latter doesn't seem confusing at all

Re: [Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> I'm also confused by the fact that I had to update ghostscript >> explicitly when I just did a selfupdate/update-all yesterday. > > That latter doesn't seem confusing at all...it's just a restatement of > what you noted previously: the gs vers

Re: [Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:51:07AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: > The gnucash2 saga continues: building evince failed: > > checking for Ghostscript version.. found 6 > configure: error: You need Ghostscript version >= 7 in order to run evince > > I did a "fink update ghostscript" and was upgrad

[Fink-users] evince and gs

2009-03-04 Thread Mark J. Reed
The gnucash2 saga continues: building evince failed: checking for Ghostscript version.. found 6 configure: error: You need Ghostscript version >= 7 in order to run evince I did a "fink update ghostscript" and was upgraded to version 8, after which evince built successfully, but it seems like

Re: [Fink-users] vtk and dynamic libraries + question opengl-py25

2009-03-04 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
Just a follow-up and one question. First, thanks to Martin. Installation of vtk52 vtk52-shlib vtk52-dev worked fine and the application using vtk that I wanted to run does run! Now, the question. This application requires python-opengl. I therefore installed opengl-py25 However, when the app

Re: [Fink-users] vtk and dynamic libraries

2009-03-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote: > > Martin, would it make sense to install vtk52-shlibs or that would be > in conflict with the cocoa version? You can install the *-shlibs packages of all 3 variants simultaneously. Only the *-dev packages are mutually exclusive. But this will only make sense i